Advertisement

Scheimpflug imaging for grading and measurement of corneo-scleral-profile in different quadrants

Published:August 24, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101753

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The corneo-scleral-profile (CSP) describes the transition from cornea to sclera, while the corneo-scleral junction angle (CSJ), is the angle formed between the cornea and the sclera. The aims of this study were (i) to analyse the CSP and CSJ in different quadrants and (ii) to test correlation and repeatability of an established observational grading and measurement method, using Scheimpflug images.

      Methods

      The nasal, temporal, superior and inferior CSP of 35 healthy eye participants (mean age 25.5 SD ± 3.1 years; 20 female) was imaged using the corneo-scleral-profile module of the Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). On the captured Scheimpflug images CSP was subjectively graded into five different corneo-scleral transitions, using the Meier grading scale (profile 1 fluid-convex; profile 2 fluid-tangential; profile 3 marked-convex; profile 4 marked-tangential; profile 5 concave). The CSJ was measured on the same images using ImageJ v1.8.0. Grading and measurement was repeated at a second session. Intra-observer reliability for the CSP-grading was analysed by Cohen’s Kappa. Differences between repeated CSJ-measurements and different quadrants were analysed by paired-t-test and ANOVA. The eta-coefficient was used to determine the association between subjective CSP-grading and CSJ-measurement.

      Results

      Intra-observer reliability for the CSP grading system was poor (kappa = 0.098) whereas repeated measurements of CSJ angle showed no statistically significant difference between sessions (0.04°; 95 % CI − 0.21° to 0.29°; p = 0.77). CSJ angles ranged from 172° to 180° with no statistically significant differences between nasal, temporal, superior and inferior (p = 0.24). Eta-coefficient indicated a weak association between CSP-grading and CSJ-measurement (η = 0.27; p = 0.04).

      Conclusions

      The subjective CSP-grading showed poorer repeatability than the objective CSJ-measurement, which did not detect any differences in angles between the meridians.
      The weak association between CSP-grading and CSJ-measurement is likely caused by the limited intra-observer reliability of the Meier grading scale. Furthermore, the CSP-grading scale seems to consider other aspects beside the CSJ angle, such as scleral radius.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gaggioni M.
        • Meier D.
        The corneo scleral profile.
        NOJ. 1987; 1: 66-71
        • Meier D.
        Corneo scleral profile for individual contact lens fitting.
        Die Kontaktlinse. 1992; 26: 4-11
        • Rott-Muff D.
        • Keller U.
        • Häusler M.
        • Spinell M.R.
        The corneo scleral profile and its effects on the design of soft lenses.
        Die Kontaktlinse. 2001; 5: 26-34
        • Bokern S.
        • Hoppe M.
        • Bandlitz S.
        Accuracy and repeatability of grading corneo scleral profile.
        Die Kontaktlinse. 2007; 40: 26-28
        • Hall L.A.
        • Young G.
        • Wolffsohn J.S.
        • Riley C.
        The influence of corneoscleral topography on soft contact lens fit.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 6801-6806
        • Hall L.A.
        • Hunt C.
        • Young G.
        • Wolffsohn J.
        Factors affecting corneoscleral topography.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 3691-3701
        • Bandlitz S.
        • Esper P.
        • Stein M.
        • Dautzenberg T.
        • Wolffsohn J.S.
        Corneoscleral topography measured with Fourier-based profilometry and Scheimpflug imaging.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2020;
      1. G. DeNaeyer, D.R. Sanders, sMap3D Corneo-Scleral Topographer Repeatability in Scleral Lens Patients, Eye Contact Lens 44 Suppl 1 (2018) S259-S264.

        • Iskander D.R.
        • Wachel P.
        • Simpson P.N.
        • Consejo A.
        • Jesus D.A.
        Principles of operation, accuracy and precision of an Eye Surface Profiler.
        Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016; 36: 266-278
        • Barnett M.
        • Courey C.
        • Fadel D.
        • Lee K.
        • Michaud L.
        • Montani G.
        • et al.
        CLEAR - scleral lenses.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021; 44: 270-288
        • Bataille L.
        • Molina-Martin A.
        • Pinero D.P.
        Comparative analysis of two clinical diagnostic methods of the corneoscleral geometry.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2021; 47: 546-551
        • Consejo A.
        • Behaegel J.
        • Van Hoey M.
        • Iskander D.R.
        • Rozema J.J.
        Scleral asymmetry as a potential predictor for scleral lens compression.
        Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018; 38: 609-616
        • Ritzmann M.
        • Caroline P.J.
        • Borret R.
        • Korszen E.
        An analysis of anterior scleral shape and its role in the design and fitting of scleral contact lenses.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018; 41: 205-213
        • Jandl A.
        • Ruland T.
        • Schwarz D.
        • Wolffsohn J.S.
        • Pult H.
        • Bandlitz S.
        Clinical significance of contact lens related changes of ocular surface tissue observed on optical coherence images.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020; 101388
        • Kumar P.
        • Woretaw H.
        The role of corneo-scleral junction in soft contact lens fitting: Case report on nanophthalmos.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019; 42: 226-228
        • Vincent S.J.
        • Alonso-Caneiro D.
        • Collins M.J.
        Optical coherence tomography and scleral contact lenses: clinical and research applications.
        Clin Exp Optom. 2019; 102: 224-241
        • Fadel D.
        The influence of limbal and scleral shape on scleral lens design.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018; 41: 321-328
        • Bailey I.L.
        • Bullimore M.A.
        • Raasch T.W.
        • Taylor H.R.
        Clinical grading and the effects of scaling.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991; 32: 422-432
        • Segui-Crespo M.
        • Ariza-Gracia M.A.
        • Sixpene N.L.D.
        • Pinero D.P.
        Geometrical characterization of the corneo-scleral transition in normal patients with Fourier domain optical coherence tomography.
        Int Ophthalmol. 2019; 39: 2603-2609
        • Bandlitz S.
        • Baumer J.
        • Conrad U.
        • Wolffsohn J.
        Scleral topography analysed by optical coherence tomography.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017; 40: 242-247