Advertisement

Visual performance with multifocal contact lenses and progressive addition spectacles

      Abstract

      Purpose

      As presbyopia occurs, new visual demands create a need for clear vision at multiple distances. Many spectacle wearers adapt into progressive addition lenses (PAL) in order to see clearly at distance, intermediate, and near. A multifocal contact lens provides the ability to see at these same distances without the prismatic effects of a spectacle lens or the peripheral obstruction of a spectacle frame. No studies have been done to date comparing the effect of these types of presbyopic vision correction on a variety of tests of visual performance representative of everyday tasks.

      Methods

      A battery of visual performance tasks were completed by subjects while wearing their habitual PAL spectacles. These subjects were then fit with a multifocal contact lens and wore lenses for 2 weeks or more before completing the tasks again. These functional vision tests included assessments of coincidence anticipation timing, peripheral search and hand-eye coordination, and dynamic visual acuity. Following functional vision testing, subjects completed a preference survey comparing both types of refractive correction while performing common activities of daily living.

      Results

      Performance on the majority of the tests of visual performance were equivalent (P < 0.05) when comparing PAL spectacles and multifocal contact lenses. Survey results demonstrated a preference for multifocal contact lenses overall.

      Conclusion

      PAL spectacles are widely prescribed for presbyopic patients. The findings of this study suggest that in addition to providing excellent vision, multifocal contact lenses provide functional vision performance equal to PAL spectacle wear and patients may prefer them over PAL spectacles.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wolffsohn J.S.
        • Davies L.N.
        Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies.
        Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019; 68: 124-143https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004
      1. Hindsight is 20/20: protecting your eyes from digital devices. 2015 Digital Eye Strain Report.
        The Vision Council, 2015
        • Rueff E.M.
        • Bailey M.D.
        Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017; 40: 323-328https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.010
        • Rueff E.M.
        • Varghese R.J.
        • Brack T.M.
        • Downard D.E.
        • Bailey M.D.
        A survey of presbyopic contact Lens wearers in a university setting.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 848-854https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000881
        • Dumbleton K.
        • Woods C.A.
        • Jones L.W.
        • Fonn D.
        The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2013; 39: 93-99https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e318271caf4
        • Sulley A.
        • Young G.
        • Hunt C.
        Factors in the success of new contact lens wearers.
        Contact Lens Anterio. 2017; 40: 15-24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2016.10.002
        • Pucker A.D.
        • Jones-Jordan L.A.
        • Marx S.
        • Powell D.R.
        • Kwan J.T.
        • Srinivasan S.
        • et al.
        Clinical factors associated with contact lens dropout.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019; 42: 318-324https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2018.12.002
        • Akerman D.
        40 is the New 20/20 - Presbyopia equals Opportunity.
        Contact Lens Spectrum. 2010;
        • Sheedy Je.
        Progressive addition lenses--matching the specific lens to patient needs.
        Optometry. 2004; 75: 83-102https://doi.org/10.1016/s1529-1839(04)70021-4
        • Chamadoira S.
        • Sasian J.
        • Acosta E.
        Interferometric local measurements of high-order aberrations in progressive addition lenses.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2015; 92: 1047-1055https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000708
        • Han Y.
        • Ciuffreda K.J.
        • Selenow A.
        • Ali S.R.
        Dynamic interactions of eye and head movements when reading with single-vision and progressive lenses in a simulated computer-based environment.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 1534-1545
        • Mangione C.M.
        • Lee P.P.
        • Gutierrez P.R.
        • Spritzer K.
        • Berry S.
        • Hays R.D.
        • et al.
        Development of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119: 1050-1058https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050
        • Fernandes P.R.
        • Neves H.I.
        • Lopes-Ferreira D.P.
        • Jorge J.M.
        • Gonzalez-Meijome J.M.
        Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: 228-235https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318282951b
        • Fogt N.
        • Brennen Y.
        A rapid pointing performance comparison between spectacle and contact lens wear.
        Contact Lens Spectrum. 2020; 35 (32, 4-6, 8)
        • Yaquinto B.
        Rapid pointing performance comparison between spectacle and contact lens wear.
        (Master of Science thesis) The Ohio State University, 2018
        • Fogt N.
        • Lemos E.
        Binocular and monocular coincidence-anticipation timing responses.
        Vis Dev Rehabil. 2018; 4: 188-201
        • Uchida Y.
        • Kudoh D.
        • Higuchi T.
        • Honda M.
        • Kanosue K.
        Dynamic visual acuity in baseball players is due to superior tracking abilities.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45: 319-325https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826fec97
        • Rah M.J.
        • Walline J.J.
        • Jones-Jordan L.A.
        • Sinnott L.T.
        • Jackson J.M.
        • Manny R.E.
        • et al.
        Vision specific quality of life of pediatric contact Lens wearers.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2010; 87: 560-566https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181e6a1c8
        • Pesudovs K.
        • Garamendi E.
        • Elliott D.B.
        A quality of life comparison of people wearing spectacles or contact lenses or having undergone refractive surgery.
        J Refract Surg. 2006; 22: 19-27https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597x-20060101-07
        • N H
        • EL I
        • N J
        • L D
        • KA W
        • L L
        Eye and head movement alterations in naive progressive addition lens wearers.
        Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007; 27: 142-153
        • Woods J.
        • Woods C.A.
        • Fonn D.
        Early symptomatic presbyopes-what correction modality works best?.
        Eye Contact Lens-SciClin Prac. 2009; 35: 221-226https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181b5003b