Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 45, ISSUE 3, 101452, June 2022

Download started.

Ok

Scleral contact lenses in the pediatric population—Indications and outcomes

  • Boris Severinsky
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Specialty Contact Lens Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road, NE, Suite 3506, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Phoebe Lenhart
    Affiliations
    Section of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road, NE, Suite 5400, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To report the use of a custom-designed, scleral contact lens (SL) in the treatment of pediatric patients.

      Methods

      The medical records of all patients under 15 years of age fitted with SL from March 2018 through February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Ophthalmic diagnosis, prior surgical intervention, lens wearing failures, and duration of lens use are reported.

      Results

      Lenses were dispensed to 18 patients (24 eyes). Main indications for SL fitting were refractive error correction (n = 18: keratoconus (KCN), traumatic corneal scarring, corneal transplant status, and aphakia) and ocular surface protection and optimization (n = 6: neurotrophic keratitis and chronic blepharokeratoconjunctivitis). Patient age ranged from 16 months to 14 years (mean, 9.9 ± 3.5 years (mean ± standard deviation (SD)). Patients fitted for surface disease indications were significantly younger, 8.8 ± 2.5 years. The mean maximal keratometry reading in patients with keratoconus was 64.0 ± 12.6 diopters (D). In six eyes with advanced KCN (Kmax 71.8 ± 11.0 D) and three eyes with traumatic scarring, SL use obviated the need for keratoplasty. Fifteen patients (83 %) continued scleral lens wear with a mean follow-up period of 9.2 ± 7.4 months. Complications included one case of corneal graft rejection and one corneal abrasion associated with lens insertion.

      Conclusions

      The goals of SL fitting in pediatric patients are visual rehabilitation and ocular surface protection. Pediatric patients with advanced keratoconus and traumatic corneal scarring are most appreciative of the benefits of scleral lenses. The challenges associated with SL fitting and the training process did not preclude long-term SL wear.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Visser Es.
        • Visser R.
        • Van Lier Hj.
        • Otten Hm.
        Modern scleral lenses part II: patient satisfaction.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2007; 33: 21-25
        • Rosenthal P.
        • Croteau A.
        Fluid-ventilated, gas-permeable scleral contact lens is an effective option for managing severe ocular surface disease and many corneal disorders that would otherwise require penetrating keratoplasty.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2005; 31: 130-134
        • Jacobs D.S.
        • Carrasquillo K.G.
        • Cottrell P.D.
        • et al.
        CLEAR - Medical use of contact lenses.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021; 44: 289-329
        • Ezekiel D.
        Gas permeable haptic lenses.
        J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1983; 6: 158-161
        • Michaud L.
        • Lipson M.
        • Kramer E.
        • Walker M.
        The official guide to scleral lens terminology.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019; (Epub ahead of print, Sep 24)
        • Schornack M.
        • Nau C.
        • Nau A.
        • Fogt J.
        • Shorter E.
        Visual and physiological outcomes of scleral lens wear.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019; 42: 3-8
        • Nau C.B.
        • Harthan J.
        • Shorter E.
        • et al.
        Demographic characteristics and prescribing patterns ofScleral Lens fitters: the SCOPE study.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2018; 44: S265-S272
        • Gungor I.
        • Schor K.
        • Rosenthal P.
        • Jacobs D.S.
        The Boston Scleral Lens in the treatment of pediatric patients.
        JAAPOS. 2008; 12: 263-267
        • Rathi V.M.
        • Mandathara P.S.
        • Vaddavalli P.K.
        • Srikanth D.
        • Sangwan V.S.
        Fluid filled scleral contact lens in pediatric patients: challenges and outcome.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012; 35: 189-192
        • McMahon T.T.
        • Szczotka-Flynn L.
        • Barr J.T.
        • et al.
        A new method for grading the severity of keratoconus: the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS).
        Cornea. 2006; 25: 794-800
        • Bergmanson J.P.
        • Walker M.K.
        • Johnson L.A.
        Assessing scleral contact Lens satisfaction in a keratoconus population.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 855-860
        • Olivares Jiménez J.L.
        • Guerrero Jurado J.C.
        • Bermudez Rodriguez F.J.
        • Serrano Laborda D.
        Keratoconus: age of onset and natural history.
        Optom Vis Sci. 1997; 74: 147-151
        • Mukhtar S.
        • Ambati B.K.
        Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature.
        Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38: 2257-2266
        • Huang C.
        • O’Hara M.
        • Mannis M.J.
        Primary pediatric keratoplasty: indications and outcomes.
        Cornea. 2009; 28: 1003-1008
        • Asuri M.K.
        • Garg P.
        • Gokhle N.
        • Gupta S.
        Penetrating keratoplasty in children.
        Cornea. 2000; 19: 140-144
        • Sandvik G.F.
        • Thorsrud A.
        • Råen M.
        • Østern A.E.
        • Sæthre M.
        • Drolsum L.
        Does corneal collagen cross-linking reduce the need for keratoplasties in patients with keratoconus?.
        Cornea. 2015; 34: 991-995
        • Koppen C.
        • Kreps E.O.
        • Anthonissen L.
        • Van Hoey M.
        • Dhubhghaill S.N.
        • Vermeulen L.
        Scleral lenses reduce the need for corneal transplants in severe keratoconus.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 185: 43-47
        • Stechschulte S.U.
        • Azar D.T.
        Complications after penetrating keratoplasty.
        Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000; 40: 27-43
        • Schornack M.M.
        • Pyle J.
        • Patel S.V.
        Scleral lenses in the management of ocular surface disease.
        Ophthalmology. 2014; 121: 1398-1405
        • Cressey A.
        • Jacobs D.S.
        • Remington C.
        • Carrasquillo K.G.
        Improvement of chronic corneal opacity in ocular surface disease with prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) treatment.
        Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018; 10: 108-113
        • Fadel D.
        Scleral lens issues and complications related to a non-optimal fitting relationship between the lens and ocular surface.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2019; 45: 152-163
        • Vincent S.J.
        • Alonso-Caneiro D.
        • Collins M.J.
        • et al.
        Hypoxic corneal changes following eight hours of scleral contact lens wear.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 293-299
        • Severinsky B.
        • Fadel D.
        • Davelman J.
        • Moulton E.
        Effect of scleral lenses on corneal topography in keratoconus: a case series of cross-linked versus non-cross-Linked eyes.
        Cornea. 2019; 38: 986-991
        • Severinsky B.
        • Millodot M.
        Current applications and efficacy of scleral contact lenses - a retrospective study.
        J Optom. 2010; 3: 158-163
        • Pullum K.W.
        • Buckley R.J.
        A study of 530 patients referred for RGP scleral contact lens assessment.
        Cornea. 1997; 16: 612-622