Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 45, ISSUE 2, 101435, April 2022

An investigation into disposal and recycling options for daily disposable and monthly replacement soft contact lens modalities

Published:March 11, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2021.03.002

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To examine the annualised waste and end-of-life disposal options with two representative soft contact lens (CL) modalities.

      Methods

      The component parts of two representative soft CL modalities were catalogued, separated, weighed and inspected for material identification: somofilcon A soft CLs (clariti elite, CooperVision Inc.) used with multi-purpose solution (MPS) (All in one Light, CooperVision Inc.) and somofilcon A CLs (clariti 1 day, CooperVision Inc). Using a model that assumed compliant wear and care of CLs, the mass of material solid waste generated by CL use over a year was calculated. Disposal options were explored using household and specialist recycling streams in order to develop recommendations for responsible disposal of CL waste.

      Results

      Full-time daily disposable (DD) CL wear generates 1.06 kg of waste annually compared to 0.83 kg generated by reusable-monthly replacement daily wear (‘reusable’) CLs. Plastic was the dominant material in both modalities. With full-time use of DD CLs, 64% of waste by mass was plastic blister trays. For full-time use of reusable CLs, where figures from lens and MPS packaging are combined, plastics accounted for 67% of waste by mass. MPS bottles alone made up almost half the waste (45%) associated with full-time reusable CL wear.

      Conclusion

      Full-time DD wear generates 27% more waste annually than full-time reusable lens wear. Reusable CL wearers can recycle 78% of waste at home. DD lens wearers have access to recycling options that allow them to recycle 100% of CL related waste. Full-time CL lens wear represents just 0.20–0.26% of the 412 kg of household waste generated per person, per year in the United Kingdom. Worn CLs should never be disposed of down the sink or lavatory. CL wearers should be aware of responsible end-of-life recycling and disposal options for all CL waste.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chalmers R.L.
        • Keay L.
        • McNally J.
        • Kern J.
        Multicenter case-control study of the role of lens materials and care products on the development of corneal infiltrates.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2012; 89: 316-325
        • Efron N.
        • Nichols J.J.
        • Woods C.A.
        • Morgan P.B.
        Trends in US contact lens prescribing 2002 to 2014.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2015; 92: 758-767
        • Geyer R.
        • Jambeck J.R.
        • Law K.L.
        Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made.
        Sci Adv. 2017; 3: e1700782
        • Schnurr R.E.J.
        • Alboiu V.
        • Chaudhary M.
        • Corbett R.A.
        • Quanz M.E.
        • Sankar K.
        • et al.
        Reducing marine pollution from single-use plastics (SUPs): a review.
        Mar Pollut Bull. 2018; 137: 157-171
        • Rolsky C.
        • Kelkar V.P.
        • Halden R.U.
        Nationwide mass inventory and degradation assessment of plastic contact lenses in US wastewater.
        Environ Sci Technol. 2020;
        • McGrath M.
        ‘don’t flush contact lenses down the loo’.
        BBC. 2018;
        • Greenwood V.
        Before you flush your contact lenses, you might want to know this.
        N Y Times. 2018;
        • Ducharme J.
        Here's how your contact lenses may be polluting the ocean.
        Time. 2018;
        • TerraCycle
        Bausch + lomb launches national ONE by ONE contact lens recycling program.
        2016 (accessed 16.11.20)
        • CooperVision
        CooperVision launches soft contact lens recycling program for all brands in Sweden.
        2019 (accessed 16.11.20)
        • Opticians B.
        Boots opticians partners with ACUVUE® and TerraCycle® to launch UK's first contact lenses recycling programme.
        2019 (accessed 17.11.20)
        • THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
        Directive 2004/12/EC amending directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste.
        2004
        • HM Government
        A green future: Our 25 year plan to improve the environment.
        2018 (accessed 13.07.20)
        • Morgan S.L.
        • Morgan P.B.
        • Efron N.
        Environmental impact of three replacement modalities of soft contact lens wear.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2003; 26: 43-46
        • Morgan P.
        UK contact lens prescribing in 2019.
        2019 (accessed 16.07.20)
        • Customer Services Terracycle Europe
        Personal communication.
        2020
        • DEFRA
        Green claims guidance.
        2011 (Accessed 11.11.20)
        • The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)
        Recycling symbols explained.
        2013 (accessed 15.07.20)
        • Greater Manchester Combined Authority
        Greater manchester key facts 2017.
        2017 (accessed 10.11.20)
        • Recycle for Greater Manchester
        Recycle for greater Manchester.
        2020 (accessed 07.12.20)
        • Wickens Z.
        How to recycle your used contact lenses – optician.
        2019 (Accessed 27.11.20)
        • George M.
        Personal communication.
        2020
        • Newman S.D.
        Packaging for disposable soft contact lenses.
        2015 (accessed 11.11.20)
        • Stevenson J.
        Lidstock material having improved burst strength.
        2004 (accessed 11.11.20)
        • Myers K.
        Personal communication.
        2020
        • DEFRA
        UK statistics on waste.
        2020 (accessed 12.11.20)
        • DEFRA
        Digest of waste and resource statisitics 2018.
        2018 (accessed 14.07.20)
        • HM Government H.M.
        OUR WASTE, OUR RESOURCES: A STRATEGY FOR ENGLAND.
        2018 (accessed 01.07.20)
        • Hahladakis J.N.
        • Iacovidou E.
        Closing the loop on plastic packaging materials: What is quality and how does it affect their circularity?.
        Sci Total Environ. 2018; 630: 1394-1400
        • RECycling of Used Plastics Limited (RECOUP)
        UK household plastics collection survey 2018.
        2018 (recoup-uk-household-plastics-collection-survey-2018-1537195423.pdf (accessed 16.07.20))
        • Milios L.
        • Holm Christensen L.
        • McKinnon D.
        • Christensen C.
        • Rasch M.K.
        • Hallstrøm Eriksen M.
        Plastic recycling in the nordics: A value chain market analysis.
        Waste Manag. 2018; 76: 180-189
        • Waste & Resources Action Program (WRAP)
        Recycling of laminated packaging.
        2011 (accessed 11.11.20)
        • Antelava A.
        • Damilos S.
        • Hafeez S.
        • Manos G.
        • Al-Salem S.M.
        • Sharma B.K.
        • et al.
        Plastic solid waste (PSW) in the context of life cycle assessment (LCA) and sustainable management.
        Environ Manag. 2019; 64: 230-244
        • Marsh K.
        • Bugusu B.
        Food packaging-roles, materials, and environmental issues.
        J Food Sci. 2007; 72: R39-55
        • Center for Devices, Radiological Health
        Device labeling.
        2019 (accessed 15.07.20)
        • THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
        REGULATION (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices.
        2017 (accessed 11.11.20)
        • THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
        93/42/EEC medical device directive.
        1993
        • Morgan P.B.
        • Efron N.
        • Woods C.A.
        Determinants of the frequency of contact lens wear.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2013; 39: 200-204
        • Efron N.
        • Efron S.E.
        • Morgan P.B.
        • Morgan S.L.
        A ‘cost-per-wear’ model based on contact lens replacement frequency.
        Clin Exp Optom. 2010; 93: 253-260
        • Wu Y.T.-Y.
        • Willcox M.
        • Zhu H.
        • Stapleton F.
        Contact lens hygiene compliance and lens case contamination: a review.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015; 38: 307-316
        • Wilson L.A.
        • Sawant A.D.
        • Simmons R.B.
        • Ahearn D.G.
        Microbial contamination of contact lens storage cases and solutions.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 1990; 110: 193-198
        • Zobel T.
        ISO 14001 adoption and industrial waste generation: the case of swedish manufacturing firms.
        Waste Manag Res. 2015; 33: 107-113
        • Rossini P.
        • Napolano L.
        • Matteucci G.
        Biotoxicity and life cycle assessment of two commercial antifouling coatings in marine systems.
        Chemosphere. 2019; 237: 124475
        • Sherman J.D.
        • Raibley 4th, L.A.
        • Eckelman M.J.
        Life cycle assessment and costing methods for device procurement: Comparing reusable and Single-Use disposable laryngoscopes.
        Anesth Analg. 2018; 127: 434-443
        • Golsteijn L.
        • Lessard L.
        • Campion J.-F.
        • Capelli A.
        • D’Enfert V.
        • King H.
        • et al.
        Developing product environmental footprint category rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.
        Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018; 14: 649-659
        • Seifert C.
        • Koep L.
        • Wolf P.
        • Guenther E.
        Life cycle assessment as decision support tool for environmental management in hospitals: A literature review.
        Health Care Manage Rev. 2019;
        • Alcon
        2019 corporate responsibility report.
        2020 (accessed 11.11.20)
        • CooperVision
        Sustainability report card.
        2019 (accessed 2020-NA-NA)
        • Johnson & Johnson
        2019 health for humanity report.
        2020 (accessed 17.11.20)
        • Menicon
        Menicon integrated report.
        2020 (accessed 11.11.20)
        • Ragaert K.
        • Delva L.
        • Van Geem K.
        Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste.
        Waste Manag. 2017; 69: 24-58
        • Orsborn G.
        • Dumbleton K.
        Eye care professionals’ perceptions of the benefits of daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019; 42: 373-379
        • Jia L.
        • Evans S.
        • Linden S.v.d.
        Motivating actions to mitigate plastic pollution.
        Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 4582
        • Linden S.v.d.
        Warm glow is associated with low- but not high-cost sustainable behaviour.
        Nat Sustain. 2018; 1: 28-30