Importance of standardizing the number of cells measured for coefficient of variation (COV) estimates of corneal endothelial cell area values as relevant to contact lens wear

      Highlights

      • a comprehensive and balanced assessment of the estimates of the coefficient of variation (COV).
      • COV estimates get predictably more variable as the extent (magnitude) of polymegethism increases.
      • these predictable increases in variability in COV should be considered in study design.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To assess the impact of using different numbers of cells in calculations of the coefficient of variation (COV) value for normal and polymegethous endothelia

      Methods

      Four sets of 20 non-contact specular microscope images obtained from Caucasian individuals were assessed, and categorized according to the extent of polymegethism, i.e. grade 0 (none), grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate) and grade 3 (substantial). Cell areas were measured manually and then values for between 2 and 100 cells were progressively added and averaged to generate COV estimates. These were then assessed in terms of their relative values (as percentages +/- SD) in relation to the value obtained on over 100 cells.

      Results

      For the 4 sets of endothelia with group-mean COV values of 25.8, 33.1, 45.1 and 56.8%, the reliability of the COV estimates realized asymptotic values of close to ±1.0, ±2.7, ±3.6 and ±5.0% with 90 cells, but with greater uncertainty with few numbers of cells, e.g. only to within ±3.4, ±5.3, ±6.1 and ±7.9% with 75 cells.

      Conclusions

      COV estimates for the corneal endothelium are dependent on the number of cells used in the calculations. It is recommended that every effort should be made to not only assess 75–100 cells per endothelial image, but that this number should be the same or very similar for all endothelial images in a particular data set so that the uncertainly (or estimated proportional error) in the estimates is balanced.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Edelhauser H.F.
        The balance between corneal transparency and edema.
        Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 1755-1767
        • Doughty M.J.
        Concerning the symmetry of the “hexagonal” cells of the corneal endothelium.
        Exp Eye Res. 1992; 55: 145-154
        • Stocker E.G.
        • Schoessler J.P.
        Corneal endothelial polymegethism induced by PMMA contact lens wear.
        Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985; 26: 857-863
        • Carlson K.H.
        • Bourne W.M.
        • Brubaker R.F.
        Effect of long-term contact lens wear on corneal endothelial cell morphology and function.
        Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988; 29: 185-193
        • MacRae S.M.
        • Matsuda M.
        • Yee R.
        The effect of long-term hard contact lens wear on the corneal endothelium.
        CLAO J. 1985; 11: 322-326
        • Doughty M.J.
        • Fonn D.
        • Trang Nguyen K.
        Assessment of the reliability of calculations of the coefficient of variation for normal and polymegethous human corneal endothelium.
        Optom Vis Sci. 1993; 70: 759-770
        • McCarey B.E.
        • Edelhauser H.F.
        • Lynn M.J.
        Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions.
        Cornea. 2008; 27: 1-16
        • Dutt R.M.
        • Stocker E.G.
        • Wolff C.H.
        • Glavan I.
        • Lass J.H.
        A morphologic and fluorophotometric analysis of the corneal endothelium in long-term extended wear soft contact lens wearers.
        CLAO J. 1989; 15: 121-123
        • Galgauskas S.
        • Ignataviciute J.
        • Vieversyte Z.
        • Asoklis R.
        Endothelial parameters in central and peripheral cornea in patients wearing contact lenses.
        Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11: 1768-1773
        • Leem H.S.
        • Lee K.J.
        • Shin K.C.
        Central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial cell changes caused by contact lens use in diabetic patients.
        Yonsei Med J. 2011; 52: 322-325
        • Yagmur M.
        • Okay O.
        • Sizmaz S.
        • Unal I.
        • Yar K.
        In vivo confocal microscopy: corneal changes of hydrogel contact lens wearers.
        Int Ophthalmol. 2011; 31: 377-383
        • Ahmad A.
        • Mohd-Ali B.
        • Ishak B.
        Changes in the morphology of corneal endothelial cells in young myopic adults after 6 months of wearing soft contact lenses: a Malaysian perspective.
        Clin Optom. 2018; 10: 109-113
        • Maruoka S.
        • Nakakura S.
        • Matsuo N.
        • Yoshitomi K.
        • Katakami C.
        • Tabuchi H.
        • et al.
        Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.
        Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38: 2495-2507
        • Singh I.
        • Kumar D.
        • Singh S.
        Specular microscopic changes in corneal endothelium after cataract surgery in different age group.
        J Med Sci Clin Res. 2015; 3: 3619-3628
        • Jiang J.
        • Gong J.
        • Li W.
        • Hong C.
        Comparison of intra-operative 0.02% mitomycin C and sutureless limbal conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery: five-year follow-up.
        Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; 93: e568-e572
        • Kim D.H.
        • Wee W.R.
        • Hyon J.Y.
        The pattern of early corneal endothelial cell recovery following cataract surgery: cellular migration or enlargement?.
        Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015; 253: 2211-2216
        • Doughty M.J.
        On the regional variability of averaged cell area estimates for the human corneal endothelium in relation to the extent of polymegethism.
        Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38: 2537-2546
        • Doughty M.J.
        The ambiguous coefficient of variation, polymegethism of the corneal endothelium and central corneal thickness.
        Int Contact Lens Clin. 1990; 17: 240-247
        • Rao G.N.
        • Stevens R.E.
        • Mandelberg A.I.
        • Aquavella J.V.
        Morphologic variations in graft endothelium.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 1980; 98: 1403-1406
        • Rao G.N.
        • Shaw E.L.
        • Stevens R.E.
        • Aquavella J.V.
        Automated pattern analysis of corneal endothelium.
        Ophthalmology. 1979; 86: 1367-1373