Diagnostic patterns in keratoconus

  • Elke O. Kreps
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
    Affiliations
    Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

    Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Ghent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ilse Claerhout
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Ghent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Department of Ophthalmology, Maria Middelares General Hospital, Buitenring-Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Carina Koppen
    Affiliations
    Department of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium

    Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To investigate the current patterns of diagnosis and referral in keratoconus.

      Methods

      A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who had recently been diagnosed with keratoconus and attended dedicated clinics at Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium and Maria Middelares General Hospital, Ghent, Belgium between June 2013 and February 2018. Exclusion criteria included longstanding keratoconus diagnosis, reduced cognitive capabilities and prior surgical procedures (corneal crosslinking, penetrating keratoplasty or any type of refractive surgery).

      Results

      Three-hundred and ninety-nine patients (722 eyes) were included in this study. The mean age was 24.7 ± 6.5 years and the average maximal keratometry was 51 ± 5.2 D for the better eye and 58.4 ± 9.6 D for the worse eye. Upon diagnosis, 233 eyes (32.2 %) and 51 eyes (7.1 %) had a thinnest pachymetry <450 and <400 μm, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, 58 % of patients had been fitted with specialty contact lenses. During follow-up, 199 eyes (27.6 %) underwent corneal crosslinking. One patient underwent corneal graft surgery of his worse eye due to contact lens intolerance and insufficient visual acuity.

      Conclusion

      Despite advances in diagnostic tools, keratoconus is often diagnosed at a relatively late stage. Earlier detection of keratoconus would increase the overall clinical benefit of corneal crosslinking. Further research into screening strategies is required to develop cost-effective screening programs.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mas Tur V.
        • MacGregor C.
        • Jayaswal R.
        • O’Brart D.
        • Maycock N.
        A review of keratoconus: diagnosis, pathophysiology and genetics.
        Surv Ophthalmol. 2017; 62: 770-783https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009
        • Shalchi Z.
        • Wang X.
        • Nanavaty M.A.
        Safety and efficacy of epithelium removal and transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus.
        Eye (Lond). 2015; 29: 15-29https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.230
        • Papali’i-Curtin A.T.
        • Cox R.
        • Ma T.
        • Woods L.
        • Covello A.
        • Hall R.C.
        Keratoconus prevalence among high school students in New Zealand.
        Cornea. 2019; 38: 1382-1389https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002054
        • Torres Netto E.A.
        • Al-Otaibi W.M.
        • Hafezi N.L.
        • Kling S.
        • Al-Farhan H.M.
        • Randleman J.B.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of keratoconus in paediatric patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2018; 102: 1436-1441https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311391
        • Krumeich J.H.
        • Daniel J.
        • Knulle A.
        Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24: 456-463
        • Godefrooij D.A.
        • de Wit G.A.
        • Uiterwaal C.S.
        • Imhof S.M.
        • Wisse R.P.
        Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2017; 175: 169-172https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.015
        • Assiri A.A.
        • Yousuf B.I.
        • Quantock A.J.
        • Murphy P.J.
        Incidence and severity of keratoconus in Asir province, Saudi Arabia.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89: 1403-1406
        • Ziaei H.
        • Jafarinasab M.R.
        • Javadi M.A.
        • Karimian F.
        • Poorsalman H.
        • Mahdavi M.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of keratoconus in an Iranian population.
        Cornea. 2012; 31: 1044-1047https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8d3c
        • Georgiou T.
        • Funnell C.L.
        • Cassels-Brown A.
        • O’Conor R.
        Influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and associated atopic disease in Asians and white patients.
        Eye (Lond). 2004; 18: 379-383
        • Wu Y.
        • Tan Q.
        • Zhang W.
        • Wang J.
        • Yang B.
        • Ma W.
        • et al.
        Rigid gas-permeable contact lens related life quality in keratoconic patients with different grades of severity.
        Clin Exp Optom. 2015; 98: 150-154https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12237
        • DeLoss K.S.
        • Fatteh N.H.
        • Hood C.T.
        Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE) scleral device compared to keratoplasty for the treatment of corneal ectasia.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158: 974-982https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.016
        • Koppen C.
        • Kreps E.O.
        • Anthonissen L.
        • Van Hoey M.
        • Dhubhghaill S.N.
        • Vermeulen L.
        Scleral lenses reduce the need for corneal transplants in severe keratoconus.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 185: 43-47https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.022
        • Barnett M.
        • Mannis M.J.
        Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus.
        Cornea. 2011; 30: 1510-1516https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318211401f
        • Abdalla Y.F.
        • Elsahn A.F.
        • Hammersmith K.M.
        • Cohen E.J.
        SynergEyes lenses for keratoconus.
        Cornea. 2010; 29: 5-8https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a9d090
        • Leung V.C.
        • Pechlivanoglou P.
        • Chew H.F.
        • Hatch W.
        Corneal collagen cross-linking in the management of keratoconus in Canada: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1108-1119https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.019
        • Salmon H.A.
        • Chalk D.
        • Stein K.
        • Frost N.A.
        Cost effectiveness of collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in the UK NHS.
        Eye (Lond). 2015; 29: 1504-1511https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.151
        • Wisse R.P.L.
        • Simons R.W.P.
        • van der Vossen M.J.B.
        • Muijzer M.B.
        • Soeters N.
        • Nuijts R.M.M.A.
        • et al.
        Clinical evaluation and validation of the dutch crosslinking for keratoconus score.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019; 137: 610-616https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0415