Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 43, ISSUE 1, P54-59, February 2020

Download started.

Ok

Reducing treatment zone diameter in orthokeratology and its effect on peripheral ocular refraction

Published:November 24, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.006

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To determine whether orthokeratology (OK) induced treatment zone (TZ) diameter can be reduced by altering OK lens design, and if so the impact of modifying TZ diameter on relative peripheral refraction (RPR).

      Methods

      16 subjects (mean age 23.4 ± 1.5 years; 8 female) completed the study. Standard (Control) OK lens design (PJ, Capricornia, Australia) or a modified version (Test) where the back optic zone diameter was reduced, and back optic zone asphericity and intermediate lens curves were altered, were worn overnight only for 7-nights in a randomised double masked order, with a minimum 1-week wash out (no lens wear) between lens designs. Full correction of refractive error was targeted. Refraction; best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); RPR (Shin-Nippon NVision-k 5001) along the horizontal and vertical meridians; and corneal topography (Medmont E300) were measured before starting lens wear and in the morning after lens removal after the seventh night of lens wear for both lens designs. TZ diameter and decentration was calculated from corneal topography.

      Results

      After 7-nights of wear both lens designs created -2.00D refraction effect with no significant difference in refractive effect or change to BCVA between the designs. The Test design created a significantly smaller horizontal (4.78 ± 0.37 vs 5.70 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.001) and vertical (5.09 ± 0.51 vs 5.92 ± 0.51 mm p < 0.001) TZ diameter. The TZ was decentered inferior temporal with no significant difference between designs. There was no significant difference between the lens designs in RPR along the horizontal and vertical meridians at any measurement period.

      Conclusions

      OK induced TZ diameter can be reliably reduced by altering OK lens design without detrimentally effecting lens centration or refractive effect. Reducing TZ diameter did not alter RPR, though measurement artifacts could be responsible for masking an effect. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether smaller TZ OK lens designs increase efficacy for slowing progression of myopia.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Swarbrick H.A.
        • Wong G.
        • O’Leary D.J.
        Corneal response to orthokeratology.
        Optom Vis Sci. 1998; 75: 791-799
        • Jessen G.N.
        Orthofocus techniques.
        Contacto. 1962; 6: 200-204
        • Morgan P.B.
        • Efron N.
        • Woods C.A.
        • Santodomingo-Rubido J.
        International survey of orthokeratology contact lens fitting.
        Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019; 42: 450-454
        • Charm J.
        • Cho P.
        High myopia-partial reduction ortho-k: a 2-year randomized study.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: 530-539
        • Chen C.
        • Cheung S.W.
        • Cho P.
        Myopia control using toric orthokeratology (TO-SEE study).
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 6510-6517
        • Cho P.
        • Cheung S.W.
        • Edwards M.
        The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control.
        Curr Eye Res. 2005; 30: 71-80
        • Cho P.
        • Cheung S.W.
        Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology (ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 7077-7085
        • Kakita T.
        • Hiraoka T.
        • Oshika T.
        Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 2170-2174
        • Santodomingo J.
        Controlling myopia progression with Ortho-K.
        Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2011; 34: S2
        • Walline J.J.
        • a J.L.
        • Sinnott L.T.
        Corneal reshaping and myopia progression.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93: 1181-1185
        • Holden B.A.
        • Fricke T.R.
        • Wilson D.A.
        • Jong M.
        • Naidoo K.S.
        • Sankaridurg P.
        • et al.
        Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050.
        Ophthalmol. 2016; 123: 1036-1042
        • Efron N.
        • Morgan P.B.
        • Woods C.A.
        • Santodomingo-Rubido J.
        • Nichols J.
        International survey of contact lens fitting for myopia control in children.
        Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2018.11.005
        • Kang P.
        • Swarbrick H.
        Peripheral refraction in myopic children wearing orthokeratology and gas-permeable lenses.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2011; 88: 11-17
        • Kang P.
        • Swarbrick H.
        New perspective on myopia control with orthokeratology.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 497-503
        • Smith E.L.
        • Kee C.-S.
        • Ramamirtham R.
        • Qiao-Grider Y.
        • Hung L.-F.
        Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in infant monkeys.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46: 3965-3972
        • Joslin C.
        • Wu S.
        • McMahon T.
        • Shahidi M.
        Higher-order wavefront aberrations in corneal refractive therapy.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2003; 80: 805-811
        • D a B.
        • Barr J.T.
        • Mitchell G.L.
        The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher-order aberrations and best-corrected visual acuity.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82: 490-497
        • Stillitano I.G.
        • Chalita M.R.
        • Schor P.
        • Maidana E.
        • Lui M.M.
        • Lipener C.
        • et al.
        Corneal changes and wavefront analysis after orthokeratology fitting test.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 144: 378-386
        • Anera R.G.
        • Villa C.
        • Jiménez J.R.
        • Gutierrez R.
        Effect of LASIK and contact lens corneal refractive therapy on higher order aberrations and contrast sensitivity function.
        J Refract Surg. 2009; 25: 277-284
        • El Hage S.
        • Leach N.E.
        • Miller W.
        • Prager T.C.
        • Marsack J.
        • Parker K.
        • et al.
        Empirical advanced orthokeratology through corneal topography: the University of Houston clinical study.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2007; 33: 224-235
        • Gifford P.
        • Li M.
        • Lu H.
        • Miu J.
        • Panjaya M.
        • Swarbrick H.
        Cornea versus aberrations after overnight orthokeratology.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: 439-447
        • Gifford K.
        • Gifford P.
        • Hendicott P.L.
        • Schmid K.L.
        Zone of clear single binocular vision in myopic orthokeratology.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.614
        • Faria-Ribeiro M.
        • Belsue R.N.
        • Lopex-Gil N.
        • Gonzalez-Meijome J.M.
        Morphology, topography, and optics of the orthokeratology cornea.
        J Biomed Optics. 2016; 21: 75011
        • Tarrant J.
        • Liu Y.
        • Wildsoet C.
        Orthokeratology can decrease the accommodative lag in myopes.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50 (E-Abstract 4294)
        • Si J.-K.
        • Tang K.
        • Bi H.-S.
        • Guo D.-D.
        • Guo J.-G.
        • Wang X.-R.
        Orthokeratology for myopia control: a meta-analysis.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2015; 92: 252-257
        • Sun Y.
        • Xu F.
        • Zhang T.
        • Liu M.
        • Wang D.
        • Chen Y.
        • et al.
        Orthokeratology to control myopia progression: a meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0124535
        • Kang P.
        • Swarbrick H.
        The influence of different OK lens designs on peripheral refraction.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 1112-1119
        • Chen Z.
        • Niu L.
        • Xue F.
        • Qu X.
        • Zhou Z.
        • Zhou X.
        • et al.
        Impact of pupil diameter on axial growth in orthokeratology.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2012; 89: 1636-1640
        • Arumugam B.
        • Hung L.F.
        • To C.H.
        • Sankaridurg P.
        • Smith E.L.
        The effects of the relative strength of simultaneous competing defocus signals on emmetropization in infant rhesus monkeys.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 3949-3960
        • Arumugam B.
        • Hung L.F.
        • To C.H.
        • Holden B.
        • Smith E.L.
        The effects of simultaneous dual focus lenses on refractive development in infant monkeys.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 7423-7432
        • Benavente-Pérez A.
        • Nour A.
        • Troilo D.
        Axial eye growth and refractive error development can be modified by exposing the peripheral retina to relative myopic or hyperopic defocus.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 6765-6773
        • Liu Y.
        • Wildsoet C.
        The effect of two-zone concentric bifocal spectacle lenses on refractive error development and eye growth in young chicks.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 1078-1086
        • Marcotte-Collard R.
        • Simard P.
        • Michaud L.
        Analysis of two orthokeratology lens designs and comparison of their optical effects on the cornea.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2018; 44: 322-339
        • Kang P.
        • Gifford P.
        • Swarbrick H.
        Can manipulation of orthokeratology lens parameters modify peripheral refraction?.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: 1237-1248
        • Franklin R.J.
        • Morelande M.R.
        • Iskander D.R.
        • Collins M.J.
        • Davis B.A.
        Combining central and peripheral videokeratoscope maps to investigate total corneal topography.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2006; 32: 27-32
        • Klein S.
        A corneal topography algorithm that produces continuous curvature.
        Optom Vis Sci. 1992; 69: 829-834
        • Lee T.-T.
        • Cho P.
        Repeatability of relative peripheral refraction in untreated and orthokeratology-treated eyes.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2012; 89: 1477-1486
        • Thibos L.N.
        • Hong X.
        • Bradley A.
        • Applegate R.A.
        Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations.
        J Vis. 2004; 4: 329-351
        • Maseedupally V.K.
        • Gifford P.
        • Lum E.
        • Naidu R.
        • Sidawi D.
        • Wang B.
        • et al.
        Treatment zone decentration during orthokeratology on eyes with corneal toricity.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 1101-1111
        • Swarbrick H.A.
        • Alharbi A.
        • Watt K.
        • Lum E.
        • Kang P.
        Myopia control during orthokeratology lens wear in children using a novel study design.
        Ophthalmol. 2015; 122: 620-630
        • Santodomingo-Rubido J.
        • Villa-Collar C.
        • Gilmartin B.
        • Gutiérrez-Ortega R.
        Orthokeratology vs. spectacles: adverse events and discontinuations.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2012; 89: 1133-1139
        • Charman W.N.
        • Mountford J.
        • Atchison D.A.
        • Markwell E.L.
        Peripheral refraction in orthokeratology patients.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83: 641-648
        • Korszen E.
        • Caroline P.
        The anatomy of a modern orthokeratology lens.
        Contact Lens Spectrum. 2017; 32 (30–2,34,35,40)
        • Osuagwu U.L.
        • Suheimat M.
        • Wolffsohn J.S.
        • Atchison D.A.
        Peripheral refraction validity of the Shin-Nippon SRW5000 autrorefractor.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 1254-1261
        • Maseedupally V.
        • Gifford P.
        • Swarbrick H.A.
        Central and paracentral corneal curvature changes during orthokeratology.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90: 1249-1258
        • Lui W.
        • Edwards M.
        Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 1: efficacy and predictability.
        Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2000; 23: 77-89
        • Fan L.
        • Jun J.
        • Jia Q.
        • Wangqing J.
        • Xinjie M.
        • Yi S.
        Clinical study of orthokeratology in young myopic adolescents.
        Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999; 26: 113-116
        • Mountford J.
        An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology.
        Int Contact Lens Clin. 1997; 24: 128-144
        • Nichols J.
        • Marsich M.
        • Nguyen M.
        • Barr J.
        • Bullimore M.
        Overnight orthokeratology.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2000; 77: 252-259
        • Garner L.F.
        • Owens H.
        The relationship between the sagitta of the anterior corneal surface and refractive error of the eye.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2004; 81: 636-639
        • Owens H.
        • Garner L.F.
        • Craig J.P.
        • Gamble G.
        Posterior corneal changes with orthokeratology.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2004; 81: 421-426
        • Alharbi A.
        • Swarbrick H.A.
        The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 2518-2523