Advertisement
Case Report| Volume 43, ISSUE 1, P60-64, February 2020

Download started.

Ok

Changes in aniseikonia of an axial anisometrope at various stages of orthokeratology lens wear

Published:November 12, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2019.10.135

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To report a case of reduced aniseikonia in a myopic axial anisometrope during orthokeratology (OK) lens wear.

      Case report

      A 19-year-old female university student with myopic anisometropia presented for an OK lens fitting consultation. At baseline, perceptual interocular image size difference or aniseikonia of 1.45% was found, with a smaller image seen by the right eye compared to the left eye. The patient was fitted with a pair of OK lenses and interocular image size differences, subjective refraction and corneal topography were measured after 7, 14 and 47 days of overnight lens wear. Hyperopic shifts in central refraction and corresponding flattening of the central cornea was measured during OK treatment. Aniseikonia reduced after OK wear with the most significant change measured from baseline to day 7. Aniseikonia recorded after 7, 14 and 47 nights of lens wear was 0.05%, 0.35% and 0.85%, respectively. Although minimum differences in refractive error between eyes was reached after 47 days of OK, aniseikonia was greater than that measured after 7 and 14 days of OK.

      Conclusion

      This case report demonstrates reduction in aniseikonia with OK lens wear in a myopic patient with axial anisometropia, although this effect was not sustained beyond 1 week of lens wear. As the impact of corneal curvature changes on aniseikonia is not well understood, future studies on the impact of OK on aniseikonia and associated asthenopia is required.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lancaster W.
        Aniseikonia.
        Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1938; : 227-234
        • Kramer P.W.
        • Lubkin V.
        • Pavlica M.
        • Covin R.
        Symptomatic aniseikonia in unilateral and bilateral pseudophakia. A projection space eikonometer study.
        Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1999; 14: 183-190
        • Hrynchak P.
        Prescribing spectacles: reasons for failure of spectacle lens acceptance.
        Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006; 26: 111-115
        • Katsumi O.
        • Miyanaga Y.
        • Hirose T.
        • Okuno H.
        • Asaoka I.
        Binocular function in unilateral aphakia: correlation with aniseikonia and stereoacuity.
        Ophthalmology. 1988; 95: 1088-1093
        • Jiménez J.R.
        • Ponce A.
        • Jiménez Del Barco L.
        • Díaz J.A.
        • Pérez-Ocon F.
        Impact of induced aniseikonia on stereopsis with random-dot stereogram.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2002; 79: 121-125
        • Jiménez J.R.
        • Ponce A.
        • González Anera R.
        Induced aniseikonia diminishes binocular contrast sensitivity and binocular summation.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2004; 81: 559-562
        • Winn B.
        • Ackerley R.G.
        • Brown C.A.
        • Murray F.K.
        • Paris J.
        • John M.F.S.
        Reduced aniseikonia in axial anisometropia with contact lens correction.
        Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988; 8: 341-344
        • Vincent S.J.
        • Collins M.J.
        • Read S.A.
        • Carney L.G.
        Myopic anisometropia: ocular characteristics and aetiological considerations.
        Clin Exp Optom. 2014;
        • Rutstein R.P.
        • Fullard R.J.
        • WilsonJ A.
        • Gordon A.
        Aniseikonia induced by cataract surgery and its effect on binocular vision.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2015; 92: 201-207
        • Barrett B.T.
        • Bradley A.
        • Candy T.R.
        The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.
        Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013; : 120-158
        • Bradley A.
        • Rabin J.
        • Freeman R.D.
        Nonoptical determinants of aniseikonia.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983; 24: 507-512
        • Chia A.
        • Johnson K.
        • Martin F.
        Use of contact lenses to correct aphakia in children.
        Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 30: 252-255
        • Russell B.
        • DuBois L.
        • Lynn M.
        • Ward M.A.
        • Lambert S.R.
        The Infant Aphakia Treatment study contact lens experience to age 5 years.
        Eye Contact Lens. 2017; 43: 352-357
        • Rosenfield M.
        Subjective refraction.
        in: Rosenfield M. Logan N. Optom. Sci. Tech. Clin. Manag.2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, Edinburgh2009: 209-228
        • Thibos L.L.
        • Wheeler W.
        • Horner D.
        Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error.
        Optom Vis Sci. 1997; 74: 367-375
        • Weiss A.H.
        Unilateral high myopia: optical components, associated factors, and visual outcomes.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87: 1025-1031
        • Scheiman M.
        • Wick B.
        Clinical management of binocular vision: heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders.
        Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2014
        • Remole A.
        Anisophoria and aniseikonia. Part II. The management of optical anisophoria.
        Optom Vis Sci. 1989; 66: 736-746
        • Remole A.
        Anisophoria and aniseikonia. Part I. The relation between optical anisophoria and aniseikonia.
        Optom Vis Sci. 1989; 66: 659-670