Abstract
Objective
To examine the effect of pregnancy on the lacrimal system through tear osmolarity
measurement and the Schirmer test.
Material and Method
The study consisted of two groups of 30 women between 20 and 40 years old; the women
in the study group were in their first trimester of pregnancy, and the women in the
control group were not pregnant and did not have any diseases other than refractive
error. Tear osmolarity measurement with the TearLab osmolarity system and tear function
test Schirmer 1 were carried out on one, randomly chosen eye of each participant.
The pregnant women’s measurements were repeated on the same eye in their last trimester.
Results
The study group’s first trimester tear osmolarity measurement was 304.9 ± 8.0 mOsm/L,
while their last trimester tear osmolarity measurement was 300.2 ± 7.1mOsm/L and the
control group’s was 306.3 ± 6.2 mOsm/L. There was a statistical difference between
the study group’s first and last trimester results and between the study group’s last
trimester and the control group’s results (p < 0.05). The Schirmer test results were
18.1 ± 6.3 mm for the study group’s first trimester, 16.6 ± 6.9 mm for the last trimester
and 21.3 ± 9.0 mm for the control group. There was a statistically significant difference
between the study group’s last trimester results and the control group’s Schirmer
test results (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Both the tear osmolarity values and Schirmer values were found to decrease significantly
towards the end of pregnancy. These results suggest that decrease in both test results
may play a protective role in the ocular surface during pregnancy.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Contact Lens and Anterior EyeAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The eye and visual system in pregnancy, what to expect? An in-depth review.Oman J Ophthalmol. 2013; 6: 87-91
- Management and outcome of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy.Eye. 2004; 18: 826-832
- Blindness associated with preeclampsia and eclampsia.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1291-1298
- Thyroid disease and other endocrine disorders in pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2004; 31: 257-285
- Potential role of disrupted lacrimal acinar cells in dry eye during pregnancy.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002; 506: 153-157
- Influence of androgens and pituitary hormones on the structural profileand secretory activity of the lacrimal gland.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996; 74: 421-435
- Low serum dehydroepiandrosteronesulfate in women with primary Sjogren’s syndrome as an isolated sign of impaired HPA axis function.J Rheumatol. 2001; 28: 1259-1265
- Changes of the ocular surface and aquaporins in the lacrimal glands of rabbits during pregnancy.Mol Vis. 2011; 17: 2847-2855
- An epidemiological study of pregnancy and dry eye.Ocul Surf. 2004; 3: 127
- Lacrimal disfunction and pregnancy.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2012; 34: 170-174
- Tear film functions and intraocular pressure changes in pregnancy.Afr J Reprod Health. 2015; 19: 118-122
- Evaluation of the Schirmer tear test.Can J Ophthalmol. 1979; 14: 257-259
- Ophthalmic solutions, the ocular surface and a unique therapeutic artificial tear formulation.Am J Ophthalmol. 1989; 107: 348-355
- The definition of classification of dry eye disease: report of Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop.Ocul Surf. 2007; 5: 75-92
- Tear ozmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease.Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 151: 792-798
- Hyperosmolarity of the tear film in dry eye syndrome.Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 96: 341-344
Article info
Publication history
Published online: November 24, 2018
Accepted:
October 11,
2018
Received in revised form:
July 14,
2018
Received:
March 9,
2018
Identification
Copyright
© 2018 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.