Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 17-21, February 2012

Cone location and correction of keratoconus with rigid gas-permeable contact lenses

  • Mahmood Nejabat

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • ,
  • Mohammad Reza Khalili

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • ,
  • Cirous Dehghani

      Affiliations

    • Optometrist, Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Optometry Clinic, Dastgheib Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Tel.: +98 7116288548; fax: +98 7116288548.

published online 15 September 2011.

Abstract 

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of cone location and corneal cylinder on RGP corrected visual acuities and residual astigmatism in patients with keratoconus.

Methods

In this prospective study, 156 eyes from 134 patients were enrolled. Complete ophthalmologic examination including manifest refraction, Best spectacle visual acuity (BSCVA), slit-lamp biomicroscopy was performed and corneal topography analysis was done. According to the cone location on the topographic map, the patients were divided into central and paracentral cone groups. Trial RGP lenses were selected based on the flat Sim K readings and a ‘three-point touch’ fitting approach was used. Over contact lens refraction was performed, residual astigmatism (RA) was measured and best-corrected RGP visual acuities (RGPVA) were recorded.

Results

The mean age (±SD) was 22.1±5.3 years. 76 eyes (48.6%) had central and 80 eyes (51.4%) had paracentral cone. Prior to RGP lenses fitting mean (±SD) subjective refraction spherical equivalent (SRSE), subjective refraction astigmatism (SRAST) and BSCVA (logMAR) were −5.04±2.27D, −3.51±1.68D and 0.34±0.14, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between central and paracentral cone groups in mean values of SRSE, SRAST, flat meridian (Sim K1), steep meridian (Sim K2), mean K and corneal cylinder (p-values<0.05). Comparison of BSCVA to RGPVA shows that vision has improved 0.3logMAR by RGP lenses (p<0.0001). Mean (±SD) RA was −0.72±0.39D. There were no statistically significant differences between RGPVAs and RAs of central and paracentral cone groups (p=0.22) and (p=0.42), respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis shows that there is a statistically significant relationship between corneal cylinder and BSCVA and RGPVA, However, the relationship between corneal cylinder and residual astigmatism was not significant.

Conclusions

Cone location has no effect on the RGP corrected visual acuities and residual astigmatism in patients with keratoconus. Corneal cylinder and Sim K values influence RGP-corrected visual acuities but do not influence residual astigmatism.

Keywords: Keratoconus, Rigid gas-permeable, Cone location, Visual acuity, Residual astigmatism

 

PII: S1367-0484(11)00122-6

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2011.08.007

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 17-21, February 2012