Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 225-227 , October 2010

Daily disposable contact lens prescribing around the world

  • Nathan Efron

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 7 3138 6401; fax: +61 7 3319 6974.
  • ,
  • Philip B. Morgan

      Affiliations

    • Eurolens Research, The University of Manchester, Moffat Building, P.O. Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Magne Helland

      Affiliations

    • Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Buskerud University College, P.O. Box 235, N-3603 Kongsberg, Norway
  • ,
  • Motozumi Itoi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo 3-1-3, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
  • ,
  • Deborah Jones

      Affiliations

    • School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
  • ,
  • Jason J. Nichols

      Affiliations

    • College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, 320 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210-1280, United States
  • ,
  • Eef van der Worp

      Affiliations

    • University of Maastricht, P. Debijelaan 25, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Craig A. Woods

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

References 

  1. Meyler J, Ruston D. The world's first daily disposables. Optician. 2006;231(6053):12
  2. Efron N. Daily soft lens replacement. In:  Efron N editors. Contact Lens Practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2010;p. 199–206
  3. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation on HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65:937–941
  4. Rastogi NS. Glasses vs. contact lenses. An ophthalmic guide to saving the planet. Posted January 10, 2010. Available from: http://www.slate.com/id/2240634/ (accessed on May 22, 2010).
  5. Morgan SL, Morgan PB, Efron N. Environmental impact of three replacement modalities of soft contact lens wear. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2003;26:43–46
  6. Dumbleton K, Richter D, Woods C, Jones L, Fonn D. Compliance with contact lens replacement in Canada and the United States. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87:131–139
  7. Kerr C, Ruston D. The ACLM contact lens year book 2009. Wiltshire: Association of Contact Lens Manufacturers Ltd.; 2009;19-20
  8. Morgan PB, Efron N. A decade of contact lens prescribing trends in the United Kingdom (1996–2005). Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2006;29:59–68
  9. Morgan PB, Efron N, Helland M, Itoi M, Jones D, Nichols J, et al. Demographics of international contact lens prescribing. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2010;33:27–29
  10. Efron N, Efron SE, Morgan PB, Morgan SL. A ‘cost-per-wear’ model based on contact lens replacement frequency. Clin Exp Optom; in press.

PII: S1367-0484(10)00061-5

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2010.06.003

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 225-227 , October 2010