Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 219-224, October 2010

Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) over a thin daily disposable hydrogel contact lens

  • Daniela Sonja Nosch

      Affiliations

    • University of Applied Science, Institute of Optometry, Aarauerstrasse 30, 4600 Olten, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 44 272 78 18; fax: +41 44 275 90 30.
  • ,
  • Armin P. Duddek

      Affiliations

    • Prolens AG, Zurich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Didier Herrmann

      Affiliations

    • Prolens AG, Zurich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Oliver M. Stuhrmann

      Affiliations

    • Vedis Eye Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland

published online 14 May 2010.

Abstract 

Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) has been shown to measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) independent of corneal physical properties such as thickness, curvature and rigidity. The aim of this study was to find out if DCT remains accurate when it is applied on regularly shaped corneas while a thin, daily hydrogel contact lens (CL) is worn.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomised study and included 46 patients (46 right eyes): 26 females and 20 males. The age varied from 22 to 66 years (mean: 43.0±12.70 years). IOP and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements were taken with and without a daily disposable hydrogel CL (−0.50D), Filcon IV) in situ (using the DCT), with a randomised order of measurements.

Results

The average value for the IOP measurements without CL was 16.51±3.20mmHg, and with CL in situ it was 16.10±3.10mmHg. The mean difference was 0.41mmHg and not found to be statistically significant (p=0.074). The average value for the OPA measurement without CL was 2.20±0.79mmHg. With CL in situ it was 2.08±0.81mmHg. This gave a mean difference of 0.11mmHg and was statistically significant (p=0.025). The Bland–Altman plot showed a maximum difference in IOP of +2.44 and −2.00mmHg (CI 0.95). Regarding OPA, the maximum difference was +0.81 and −0.60mmHg (CI 0.95).

Conclusion

The presence of a thin hydrogel CL did not affect the accuracy of IOP measurements using the DCT. The ocular pulse amplitude was measured on average 5.45% lower with a CL in situ.

Keywords: Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Cornea, Intraocular pressure, Ocular pulse amplitude, Hydrogel, Contact lens

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(10)00035-4

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2010.03.005

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 219-224, October 2010