Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 4 , Pages 189-195 , August 2010

Clinical performance of different care systems with silicone hydrogel contact lenses

References 

  1. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Schnider CM, Efron N. Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(December (12)):911–921
  2. Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, Feng Y, Jones L, Fonn D. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(October (10)):758–768
  3. Stapleton F, Stretton S, Papas E, Skotnitsky C, Sweeney DF. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2006;4(January (1)):24–43
  4. Efron N, Morgan PB. Trends in the use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2008;(July):
  5. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, Levy B. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone–hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(June (6)):1172–1177
  6. Chalmers R, Long B, Dillehay S, Begley C. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(August (8)):778–784
  7. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32(December (6)):281–286
  8. Schafer J, Mitchell GL, Chalmers RL, Long B, Dillehay S, Barr J, et al. The stability of dryness symptoms after refitting with silicone hydrogel contact lenses over 3 years. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(September (5)):247–252
  9. Chalmers RL, Dillehay S, Long B, Barr JT, Bergenske P, Donshik P, et al. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(June (6)):549–554
  10. Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(January (1 Suppl.)):S101–S104[discussion S115-108, S192-104]
  11. Cheung SW, Cho P, Chan B, Choy C, Ng V. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel. Clin Exp Optom. 2007;90(March (2)):124–131
  12. Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34(July (4)):215–223
  13. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, Stein J, Stone R, David R. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(July (4)):166–174
  14. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone–hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(December (12)):753–761
  15. Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Papas E. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(April (4)):309–315
  16. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry. 2008;79(August (8)):444–454
  17. Alfonso EC, Miller D, Cantu-Dibildox J, O’Brien TP, Schein OD. Fungal keratitis associated with non-therapeutic soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(July (1)):154–155
  18. Joslin CE, Tu EY, Shoff ME, et al. The association of contact lens solution use and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(August (2)):169–180
  19. Papas EB, Carnt N, Willcox MD, Holden BA. Complications associated with care product use during silicone daily wear of hydrogel contact lens. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(November (6 Pt 2)):392–393[discussion 399–400]
  20. Woods CA, Jones DA, Jones LW, Morgan PB. A seven year survey of the contact lens prescribing habits of Canadian optometrists. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(June (6)):505–510
  21. Efron N, Morgan PB. Soft contact lens care regimens in the UK. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2008;31(December (6)):283–284
  22. Amos C. A clinical comparison of two soft lens care systems used with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optician. 2004;227(January (5933)):16–20
  23. Bruce AS, Mainstone JC, Golding TR. Analysis of tear film breakup on Etafilcon A hydrogel lenses. Biomaterials. 2001;22(December (24)):3249–3256
  24. Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, Pritchard N. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85(May (3)):176–182
  25. du Toit R, Simpson TL, Fonn D, Chalmers RL. Recovery from hyperemia after overnight wear of low and high transmissibility hydrogel lenses. Curr Eye Res. 2001;22(January (1)):68–73
  26. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(November (11)):582–585
  27. Dalton K, Subbaraman LN, Rogers R, Jones L. Physical properties of soft contact lens solutions. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(February (2)):122–128
  28. Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C, Chatterjee N, Moody KJ. Elicitation of subjective responses via sms (text) messaging in contact lens clinical trials. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;[E-abstract 075143]
  29. Plowright A, Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C, Moody KJ. An investigation of ocular comfort in contact lens wearers, spectacle wearers and non-wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;[E-abstract 85050]

☆ The authors have no commercial or financial interest in the products used in this study. Financial support for this study was provided by CIBA VISION.

PII: S1367-0484(10)00007-X

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2010.01.006

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 4 , Pages 189-195 , August 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution