Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 2 , Pages 88-92 , April 2010

Objective clinical performance of ‘comfort-enhanced’ daily disposable soft contact lenses

References 

  1. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999;26:157–162
  2. Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takehisa Y, Kinoshita S. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2563–2568
  3. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (Senofilcon A). Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:281–286
  4. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Caffery B, Simpson T, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea. 2001;20:610–618
  5. Long B, McNally J. The clinical performance of a silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear in an Asian population. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:65–71
  6. Wolffsohn JS, Peterson RC, Nick J, Winterton L, Lally J. Clinical performance of daily disposable soft contact lenses using sustained release technology. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2006;29:127–134
  7. Riley KC, Chalmers RL, Pence N. The impact of lens choice in the relief of contact lens related symptoms and ocular surface findings. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2005;28:13–19
  8. Gulsen D, Chauhan A. Ophthalmic drug delivery through contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2342–2347
  9. Mahomed A, Tighe B. Contact lenses & comfort enhancers: in vivo and in vitro release of soluble PVA. Ophthalmic Res. 2004;36:34
  10. Doughty MJ. Re-wetting, comfort, lubricant and moisturising solutions for the contact lens wearer. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 1999;22:116–126
  11. Armstrong RA, Eperjesi F, Gilmartin B. The application of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to different experimental designs in Optometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:248–256
  12. Wolffsohn JS, Purslow C. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2003;26:27–35
  13. Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, Santodomingo-Rubido J. The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2005;28:29–36
  14. Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS. Ocular surface temperature. A review. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31:117–123
  15. Guillon M, Styles E, Guillon JP, Maissa C. Preocular tear film characteristics of nonwearers and soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:273–279
  16. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Sweeney D, Willcox MDP. Differences in clinical parameters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:5116–5124
  17. Johnson ME, Murphy JP. The agreement and repeatability of tear meniscus height measurement methods. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:1030–1037
  18. Bitton E, Keech A, Simpson T, Jones L. Variability of the analysis of the tear meniscus height by optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:903–908
  19. Fujishima H, Yagi Y, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Effects of artificial tear temperature on corneal sensation and subjective comfort. Cornea. 1997;16:630–634

PII: S1367-0484(10)00005-6

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2010.01.004

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 2 , Pages 88-92 , April 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution