Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 2 , Pages 68-75 , April 2010

Role of hypo-osmotic saline drops in ocular comfort during contact lens wear

  • Ulrike Stahl

      Affiliations

    • The Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    • School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Optometry and Vision Science, Level 3, Rupert Myers Building, North Wing, Gate 14, Barker Street, NSW, 2052, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 9385 4624; fax: +61 2 9313 6243.
  • ,
  • Mark Willcox

      Affiliations

    • The Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    • The Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
    • School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Fiona Stapleton

      Affiliations

    • The Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    • The Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
    • School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

References 

  1. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers RL. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:40–46
  2. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Caffery B, Simpson T, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea. 2001;20:610–618
  3. Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:25–30
  4. Doughty MJ, Fonn D, Richter D, Simpson T, Caffery B, Gordon K. A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:624–631
  5. Nichols JJ, Ziegler C, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK. Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1911–1914
  6. Orsborne GN, Zantos SG. Practitioner survey: management of dry eye symptoms on soft lens wearers. Contact Lens Spectrum. 1989;4:23–26
  7. Needle JJ, Petchey R, Lawrenson JG. A survey of the scope of therapeutic practice by UK optometrists and their attitudes to an extended prescribing role. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28:193–203
  8. Anonymous . Management and therapy of dry eye disease: report of the Management and Therapy Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:163–178
  9. Caffery BE, Josephson JE. Is there a better “comfort drop”?. J Am Optom Assoc. 1990;61:178–182
  10. Golding TR, Efron N, Brennan NA. Soft lens lubricants and prelens tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:461–465
  11. Efron N, Golding TR, Brennan NA. The effect of soft lens lubricants on symptoms and lens dehydration. CLAO J. 1991;17:114–119
  12. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:143–151
  13. Malet F, Karsenti D, Pouliquen P. Preservative-free ocular hydrating agents in symptomatic contact lens wearers: saline versus PVP solution. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:38–43
  14. Gilbard JP, Kenyon KR. Tear diluents in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:646–650
  15. Anonymous . The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:75–92
  16. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1319–1328
  17. Stahl U, Willcox M, Naduvilath T, Stapleton F. Influence of tearfilm and contact lens osmolality on comfort in CL wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86:857–867
  18. Dalton K, Jones L, Guthrie S. Physical properties of artificial tear products. In: BCLA Clinical Conference & Exhibition. Birmingham. 2008;
  19. Perrigin JA, Quintero S, Perrigin DM, Wakefield S, Morgan A, Bergmanson JP. Comparison of osmolality values of selected ocular lubricants. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(Suppl.):251
  20. Holly FJ, Lamberts DW. Effect of nonisotonic solutions on tear film osmolality. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;20:236–245
  21. Tomlinson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K, Diaper C, McFadyen A. Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent for dry eye diagnostic. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4309–4315
  22. Stahl U, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Effect of temporary collagen inserts on ocular comfort and osmolality during contact lens wear. Ocul Surf 2007; 5th International conference: 106.
  23. Guillon J-P, Guillon M. Tear film examination of the contact lens patient. Optician. 1993;206:21–29
  24. Guillon J-P, Guillon M. The role of tears in contact lens performance and its measurements. In:  Ruben M,  Guillon M editor. Contact lens practice. London: Chapman and Hall; 1994;p. 453–484
  25. Stern J, Wong R, Naduvilath TJ, Stretton S, Holden BA, Sweeney DF. Comparison of the performance of 6- or 30-night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:398–406
  26. Fletcher E, Brennan NA. The effect of solution tonicity on the eye. Clin Exp Optom. 1993;76:17–21
  27. Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:700–704
  28. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Sweeney D, Willcox M. Differences in clinical parameters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:5116–5124
  29. Gilbard JP, Rossi SR, Heyda KG. Ophthalmic solutions, the ocular surface, and a unique therapeutic artificial tear formulation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:348–355
  30. Little SA, Bruce AS. Osmotic determinants of postlens tear film morphology and hydrogel lens movement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:117–124
  31. Martin DK, Holden BA. Variations in tear fluid osmolality, chord diameter and movement during wear of high water content hydrogel contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1983;10:332–342
  32. Golding TR, Harris MG, Smith RC, Brennan NA. Soft lens movement: effects of humidity and hypertonic saline on lens fitting. Acta Ophthalmol. 1995;73:139–144
  33. Lum E, Perera I, Ho A. Osmolality and buffering agents in soft contact lens packaging solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2004;27:21–26
  34. Aiello JP, Insler MS. The effects of hypotonic and hypertonic solutions on the fluid content of hydrophilic contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:521–523
  35. McCarey BF, Wilson LA. pH, osmolarity and temperature effects on the water content of hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Intraocul Lens Med J. 1982;8:158–167
  36. Elliot M, Fandrich H, Simpson T, Fonn D. Analysis of the repeatability of tear break-up time measurement techniques on asymptomatic subjects before, during and after contact lens wear. J Br Cont Lens Assoc. 1998;21:98–103
  37. Woods CA, Jones DA, Jones LW, Morgan PB. A seven year survey of the contact lens prescribing habits of Canadian optometrists. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:505–510
  38. Efron N, Morgan PB, Woods C. Trends in Australian contact lens prescribing 2006. Aust Optom. 2007;28:9–10
  39. Ozkan J, Papas E. Lubricant effects on low Dk and silicone hydrogel lens comfort. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:773–777
  40. Carney LG, Fullard RJ. Ocular irritation and environmental pH. Aust J Optom. 1979;62:335–336
  41. Motolko M, Breslin CW. The effect of pH and osmolarity on the ability of tolerate artificial tears. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;91:781–784

 This study was supported in part by the Australian Government through the Cooperative Research Centres Scheme, an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship through the University of New South Wales and by the Contact Lens Society of Australia Research Award (US).

PII: S1367-0484(10)00002-0

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2010.01.001

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 2 , Pages 68-75 , April 2010