Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 68-75 (April 2010)


View previous. 6 of 12 View next.

Role of hypo-osmotic saline drops in ocular comfort during contact lens wear

Ulrike StahlacCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Mark Willcoxabc, Fiona Stapletonabc

published online 01 February 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

To determine whether hypo-osmotic saline drops can improve contact lens associated discomfort and dryness by decreasing contact lens osmolality.

Methods

Fifteen symptomatic subjects wore Lotrafilcon A lenses bilaterally for 6h on two different days. According to randomisation, hypo-osmotic (280mmol/kg) or hyper-osmotic (380mmol/kg) saline drops were applied four times during each day and ocular symptoms, tear film and contact lens parameters, and contact lens osmolality were assessed.

Results

Sixty percent of the subjects preferred the hypo-osmotic saline drops, compared to 33%, who preferred the hyper-osmotic ones. Subjects experienced significantly less dryness and lens awareness with hypo-osmotic saline drops compared to hyper-osmotic ones (p<0.05). Using the hypo-osmotic drops, there was a trend for decreased contact lens osmolality from 379 to 343mmol/kg (p=0.06). There were no differences in lipid layer, non-invasive tear film break-up time, lens surface wettability, lens water content after wear, lens movement on eye or ocular staining and indentation between saline drops (all p>0.05). Interestingly, the difference in contact lens osmolality between drops did not reflect the osmolality difference between the two saline drops.

Conclusion

Hypo-osmotic saline drops were preferred by a greater number of subjects and contact lens osmolality tended to be lower with the use of hypo-osmotic saline. Hypo-osmotic drops have the potential to decrease contact lens osmolality which in turn may help improve ocular comfort. This has possible impact on the practitioners’ choice of the lens rewetting drop recommended and the design of future lens rewetting drops.

a The Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia

b The Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia

c School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Optometry and Vision Science, Level 3, Rupert Myers Building, North Wing, Gate 14, Barker Street, NSW, 2052, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 9385 4624; fax: +61 2 9313 6243.

 This study was supported in part by the Australian Government through the Cooperative Research Centres Scheme, an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship through the University of New South Wales and by the Contact Lens Society of Australia Research Award (US).

PII: S1367-0484(10)00002-0

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2010.01.001


View previous. 6 of 12 View next.