Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 124-127 , June 2010

Effect of weathering and thickness on roughness of acrylic resin and ocular button

  • Aline Ùrsula Rocha Fernandes

      Affiliations

    • University of Brasília (UnB), Barsília/DF, Brazil
    • ,
  • Marcelo Coelho Goiato

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dentistry Materials and Prosthesis, Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba, University of the State of São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: R- José Bonifácio 1193 - Vila Mendonça, Code: 16015-050, Araçatuba/São Paulo, Brazil. Tel.: +55 18 3636 3287.
    • ,
  • Daniela Micheline dos Santos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dentistry Materials and Prosthesis, Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba, University of the State of São Paulo, Brazil

References 

  1. Goiato MC, Fernandes AÚR, Santos DM, Barão VAR. Positioning magnets on a multiple/sectional maxillofacial prosthesis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8(7):101–107
  2. Raizada K, Rani D. Ocular prosthesis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30(3):152–162
  3. Artopoulou II, Montgomery PC, Wesley PJ, Lemon JC. Digital imaging in the fabrication of ocular prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(4):327–330
  4. Chang WJ, Tse DT, Rosa RH, Huang A, Johnson TE, Schiffman J. Conjunctival cytology features of giant papillary conjunctivitis associated with ocular prostheses. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(1):39–45
  5. Bollen CML, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1996;7(3):201–211
  6. Goiato MC, Mancuso DN, Sundefeld MLMM, Gabriel MBM, Murakawa AC, Guiotti AM. Aesthetic and functional ocular rehabilitation. Oral Oncol Extra. 2005;41(8):162–164
  7. Moura JS, da Silva WJ, Pereira T, Del Bel Cury AA, Rodrigues Garcia RC. Influence of acrylic resin polymerization methods and saliva on the adherence of four Candida species. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(3):205–211
  8. Berger JC, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, Luo Q, Thompson G. Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(3):180–186
  9. Harrison A, Huggett R. Effect of the curing cycle on residual monomer levels of acrylic resin denture base polymers. J Dent. 1992;20(6):370–374
  10. Wolfaardt JF, Cleaton-Jones P, Fatti P. The occurrence of porosity in a heatcured poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(3):393–400
  11. Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Müssig D. Acrylic removable appliances: comparative evaluation of different postpolymerization methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(3):301.e16–22
  12. Odian G. Principles of polymerization. 3rd ed.. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991;pp. 277
  13. Dogan A, Bek B, Cevik NN, Usanmaz A. The effect of preparation conditions of acrylic denture base materials on the level of residual monomer, mechanical properties and water absorption. J Dent. 1995;23(5):313–318
  14. Lung CY, Darvell BW. Minimization of the inevitable residual monomer in denture base acrylic. Dent Mater. 2005;21(12):1119–1128
  15. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Darius PL, Van Steenberghe D. The influence of surface-free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man. J Clin Periodontol. 1990;17(3):138–144

☆ Source of public financial support: This investigation was supported by the Foundation for Support to Research of the State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP) – Brazil – Proc. 08/54932.

PII: S1367-0484(09)00180-5

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2009.12.008

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 124-127 , June 2010

Article Tools