Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 136-140, June 2010

Current silicone hydrogel UVR blocking lenses and their associated protection factors

  • Karen S. DeLoss

      Affiliations

    • Texas Eye Research and Technology Center, University of Houston College of Optometry, 4901 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX 770204, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Texas Eye Research and Technology Center, University of Houston College of Optometry, 505 J Davis Armistead Bldg, 4901 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX 770204, United States. Tel.: +1 713 743 1931.
  • ,
  • James E. Walsh

      Affiliations

    • Dublin Institute of Technology School of Physics, Kevin Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
  • ,
  • Jan P.G. Bergmanson

      Affiliations

    • Texas Eye Research and Technology Center, University of Houston College of Optometry, 4901 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX 770204, United States

published online 30 December 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) blocking contact lenses provides ocular protection factors (PF) that vary with lens thickness and the nature of the polymer dopant. This study measured the UVR PF of silicone hydrogel lenses outdoors and compares this to known methods for determining PF mathematically.

Methods

Ambient measurements were taken using an UVA-B radiometer, adapted to hold the test lenses over its sensor to quantify their UVR blocking capabilities. The UVR blocking silicone hydrogel lenses tested included galyfilcon A, senofilcon A, and enfilcon A. The first UVR blocking hydrogel lens, vasurfilcon A, and a non-blocking silicone hydrogel lens, lotrafilcon B, served as a comparison. Lens transmittance at the centre and periphery was measured and PF calculated to predict signal reduction for comparison with field measurements.

Results

There was a significant range of cut-off wavelengths across the lenses, ranging from 370nm for enfilcon A to 390nm for vasurfilcon A, with lotrafilcon B transmitting down to 265nm, with a 3nm shift from centre to periphery across the −3.00 D UVR blockers. The UVR reduction calculated from the transmittance data correlates well with field data, ranging from 90–98% for the UVR blockers to 13% for the non-blocker.

Conclusions

The silicone hydrogel lenses showed a wide range of transmittance curves with increasing PF from centre to periphery. PF calculations work well but do not always compare precisely with measured data due to factors such as sensor spectral response and the nature of the incident solar spectrum.

Keywords: Ultraviolet radiation, Protection factor, Silicone hydrogel contact lenses

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(09)00154-4

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2009.11.003

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 136-140, June 2010