Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 93-96 , April 2009

Contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis with silicone hydrogel lenses

References 

  1. Silbert JA. Corneal responses in contact lens wear. In:  Silbert JA editors. Anterior segment complications of contact lens wear. 2nd ed.. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000;[Chapters 2 to 9]
  2. Dumbleton K. Non-inflammatory silicone hydrogel contact lens complications. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:S186–S189
  3. Santodomingo-Rubido J. The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide-vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:168–173
  4. Stapleton F, Stretton S, Sankaridurg PR, et al. Hypersensitivity responses and contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2003;26:57–69
  5. Efron N, Morgan PB, Cameron ID, et al. Oxygen permeability and water content of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:328–337
  6. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: structure, properties and behaviour. Silicone hydrogels: continuous wear contact lenses. 2nd ed.. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004;[Chapter 1]
  7. Tighe B. Contact lens materials. In:  Phillips A,  Speedwell L editor. Contact lenses. Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006;
  8. Sweeney DF. Clinical signs of hypoxia with high-Dk soft lens extended wear: is the cornea convinced?. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:S22–S25
  9. Sweeney D, du TR, Keay L, et al. Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. Silicone hydrogels: continuous wear contact lenses. 2nd ed.. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004;[Chapter 6]
  10. Stapleton F, Stretton S, Papas E, et al. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2006;4:24–43
  11. Jones LWJ, Dumbleton K. Soft lens extended wear and complications. In:  Hom M,  Bruce A editor. Manual of contact lens prescribing and fitting. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006;
  12. Jones LWJ, Subbaraman LN, Rogers R, Dumbleton K. Surface treatment, wetting and modulus of silicone hydrogels. Optician. 2006;28–34
  13. Dumbleton K, Jones LWJ, Chalmers R, et al. Clinical characterization of spherical post-lens debris associated with lotrafilcon high-Dk silicone lenses. CLAO J. 2000;26:186–192
  14. Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, Doughty MJ, et al. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:130–141
  15. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Efron N, Efron S. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:536–548
  16. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: local and general. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:27–36
  17. Stern J, Wong R, Naduvilath TJ, et al. Comparison of the performance of 6- or 30-night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:398–406
  18. Miller T, Papas E, Ozkan J, et al. Clinical appearance and microscopic analysis of mucin balls associated with contact lens wear. Cornea. 2003;740–745
  19. Morgan PB, Efron N. Comparative clinical performance of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses for continuous wear. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;183–192
  20. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, et al. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:9–12
  21. Carney F, Nash W, Sentall K. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;120–124
  22. Cheung SW, Cho P, Chan B, et al. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel. Clin Exp Optom. 2007;90:124–131
  23. Poggio E, Abelson MB. Complications and symptoms in disposable extended wear lenses compared with conventional soft daily wear and soft extended wear lenses. CLAO J. 1993;19:31–39
  24. Porazinski AD, Donshik P. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. CLAO J. 1999;25:142–147
  25. Tan ME, Demirci G, Pearce D, et al. Contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis is associated with increased albumin deposits on extended wear hydrogel lenses. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:951–955
  26. Donshik PC. Contact lens chemistry and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:S37–S39
  27. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85:193–197
  28. Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, et al. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70:234–243
  29. Horak F, Stübner P, Zieglmayer R, Kawina A, Moser M, Lanz R. Onset and duration of action of ketotifen 0.025% and emedastine 0. 05% in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: efficacy after repeated pollen challenges in the Vienna challenge chamber. Clinical Drug Invest. 2003;23:329–337
  30. Anderson DF. Management of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC): current therapeutic strategies. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;31:823–826
  31. Hayes V, Schnider CM, Veys J. An evaluation of 1-day disposable contact lens wear in a population of allergy sufferers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2003;26:85–93
  32. Stiegemeier M, Thomas S. Seasonal allergy relief with daily disposable lenses. Contact Lens Spectr. 2001;16:24–28
  33. Carney F, Nash W, Sentall K. The adsorption of major tear film lipids, in vitro, to various silicone hydrogel lenses over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:94
  34. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:s75–s79
  35. Senchyna M, Jones LW, Louie D, et al. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2004;28:25–36
  36. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Gepr S, et al. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:143–151
  37. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, et al. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31:787–796
  38. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:138–143
  39. Allansmith MR, Korb D, Greiner J, et al. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;83:697–708
  40. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:753–761
  41. Carnt N, Evans B, Holden BA, et al. IER matrix update: adding another silicone hydrogel. Two hour exposure to silicone hydrogel lens/solution combinations does not predict three-month clinical findings. Contact Lens Spectr. 2008;3(March (Monthly)):15–18
  42. Smythe JL. Caring for silicone hydrogels. Contact Lens Spectr. 2003;18:23

PII: S1367-0484(08)00152-5

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2008.07.005

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 93-96 , April 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution