Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 64-67, April 2009

The relationship of Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) to Thinnest Central Cornea (TCC) in healthy adults

  • Pammal T. Ashwin

      Affiliations

    • Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7 QH, UK
    • Wolverhampton Royal Eye Infirmary, New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 3 Oakhill Dr, Brierley Hill DY5 3PP, UK.
  • ,
  • Sunil Shah

      Affiliations

    • Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7 QH, UK
  • ,
  • Sreekumari Pushpoth

      Affiliations

    • Wolverhampton Royal Eye Infirmary, New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK
  • ,
  • Louai Wehbeh

      Affiliations

    • Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7 QH, UK
  • ,
  • Balasubramaniam Ilango

      Affiliations

    • Wolverhampton Royal Eye Infirmary, New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK

published online 02 February 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

The aim of the study was to precisely quantify the relationship between the central corneal points, namely the pupillary centre and the thinnest point in the central cornea, in terms of their thickness and location in healthy adults.

Methods

120 eyes of 60 healthy adult volunteers underwent pachymetry with a Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam). The thickness at the pupillary centre (Central Corneal Thickness, CCT) and the thickness at the Thinnest Central Corneal (TCC) point were measured. One eye of each patient was used to analyse the mean difference between CCT and TCC. Unpaired t-test (one tailed) was used to test significance and 95% confidence limits were used. The precise location of the TCC in relation to the corneal apex was measured using vector algebraic and trigonometric calculations.

Results

The mean CCT was 520±33μm and the TCC was 515±36μm. The difference between CCT and TCC was found to be 5.57μm (0–15.9μm, 95% CI; P=0.1909). The TCC location was inferotemporal to the corneal apex in 58/60 (96.7%) of the right eyes and in 49/60 (81.7%) of the left eyes. The average vector location of TCC of both eyes was inferotemporal. This coordinate was found to lie 0.62mm (right eye) and 0.79mm (left eye) from the corneal apex subtending and angle of 45.5° (right eye) and −10.9° (left eye) from the horizontal.

Conclusion

The study has identified the parameters of TCC and its relationship to CCT in terms of the location and thickness. For clinical usage, they can be interchangeable as there is no significant difference between the two. The consistency in the (inferotemporal) location of the TCC merits further research in this regard to the development of corneal ectasia.

Keywords: Cornea, Central, Thickness, Thinnest, Location

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(08)00149-5

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2008.07.006

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 64-67, April 2009