Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 133-140 , June 2009

Assessment of computer generated vision charts

  • Klaus Ehrmann

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
    • School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    • Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, 2052 Sydney, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 9385 7495; fax: +61 2 9385 7401.
  • ,
  • Cathleen Fedtke

      Affiliations

    • School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    • Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    • Aalen University, Aalen, Germany
  • ,
  • Alexa Radić

      Affiliations

    • School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    • Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    • Aalen University, Aalen, Germany

References 

  1. Snellen H. Probebuchstaben zur bestimmung der sehschärfe. In:  Graham C editors. Vision and visual perception. New York: Wiley; 1862;
  2. Bailey I, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53(November (11)):740–745
  3. Standard B. Test charts for determining distance visual acuity. BS 4274. London: Brit Standard Institutions; 1968;
  4. O’Leary D. Subjective refraction. In: Edwards K and R L, editors. Optometry. London: Butterworths; 1988. p. 111–39.
  5. Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnik GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:91–96
  6. Lovie-Kitchin JE. Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(4):363–370
  7. McMonnies CW. Chart memory and visual acuity measurement. Clin Exp Optom. 2001;84(January (1)):26–33
  8. Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, Ferris FH, Sangiovanni JP, Johnson CA, et al. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(February (2)):194–205
  9. Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device. Eye. 2003;17(August (6)):701–706
  10. Stewart CE, Hussey A, Davies N, Moseley MJ. Comparison of logmar etdrs chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006;26(November (6)):597–601
  11. Whatham AR, Mermoud C, Deruaz A, Goldschmidt M, Zesiger P, Safran AB. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006;26(March (2)):156–168
  12. Reeves B, Wood J, Hill A. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13:17–25
  13. ISO. ISO 8596 visual acuity testing. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardization, 1994.
  14. Raasch TW, Bailey IL, Bullimore MA. Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(May (5)):342–348
  15. Bailey I. Simplifying contrast sensitivity testing. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982;59:12
  16. Brown B, Lovie-Kitchin JE. High and low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal population. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66(July (7)):467–473
  17. McMonnies CW. Chart construction and letter legibility/readability. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19(November (6)):498–506
  18. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Letter legibility and chart equivalence. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20(March (2)):142–152
  19. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;2(3):187–199
  20. Raasch TW, Bailey l, Bullimore MA. Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(5):342–348
  21. Lenne RC, Vingrys AJ, Smith G. Automated visual acuity testing. Clin Exp Optom. 1994;77(5):190–195
  22. Reeves BC, Wood JM, Hill AR. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13(January (1)):17–26
  23. Elliott DB, Sanderson K, Conkey A. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Ophthal Phys Opt. 1990;10(1):21–24
  24. Regan D, Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:1192–2000

PII: S1367-0484(08)00148-3

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2008.09.005

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 133-140 , June 2009