Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 189-193, August 2008

Spherical aberration in contact lens wear

  • A. Lindskoog Pettersson

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Optometry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Unit of Optometry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Box 8056, S-104 20 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: +46 8 672 3036; fax: +46 8 672 3846.
  • ,
  • C. Jarkö

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Optometry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Å. Alvin

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Optometry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • P. Unsbo

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, Department of Applied Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • R. Brautaset

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Optometry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

published online 07 July 2008.

Abstract 

Introduction

The aim of the present studies was to investigate the effect on spherical aberration of different non custom-made contact lenses, both with and without aberration control.

Methods

A wavefront analyser (Zywave™, Bausch & Lomb) was used to measure the aberrations in each subject's right eye uncorrected and with the different contact lenses. The first study evaluated residual spherical aberration with a standard lens (Focus Dailies Disposable, Ciba Vision) and with an aberration controlled contact lens (ACCL) (Definition AC, Optical Connection Inc.). The second study evaluated the residual spherical aberrations with a monthly disposable silicone hydrogel lens with aberration reduction (PureVision, Bausch & Lomb).

Results

Uncorrected spherical aberration was positive for all pupil sizes in both studies. In the first study, residual spherical aberration was close to zero with the standard lens for all pupil sizes whereas the ACCL over-corrected spherical aberration. The results of the second study showed that the monthly disposable lens also over-corrected the aberration making it negative. The changes in aberration were statistically significant (p<0.05) with all lenses.

Conclusion

Since the amount of aberration varies individually we suggest that aberrations should be measured with lenses on the eye if the aim is to change spherical aberration in a certain direction.

Keywords: Spherical aberration, Contact lenses, Aberration control, Daily disposable, Silicon hydrogel

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(08)00073-8

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2008.05.005

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 189-193, August 2008