Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 239-248 , September 2007

The application of a computerised videokeratography (CVK) based contact lens fitting software programme on irregularly shaped corneal surfaces

  • Daniela S. Nosch

      Affiliations

    • Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital, Brighton, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Flat 20 Hanover Lofts, 8 Finsbury Road, Brighton BN2 9YU, UK. Tel.: +44 7970 826939.
    • ,
  • Gek L. Ong

      Affiliations

    • Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital, Brighton, UK
    • ,
  • Ioannis Mavrikakis

      Affiliations

    • Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital, Brighton, UK
    • ,
  • Judith Morris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, City University, London, UK

References 

  1. Yeung KK, Olson MD, Weissmann BA. Complexity of contact lens fitting after refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(5):607–612
  2. Zhon AJ, Kitomurak K, Weissmann BA. Contact lens care in keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2003;26(4):171–174
  3. Gasson A, Morris J. The contact lens manual: a practical fitting guide. Butterworth Heinemann; 1997;p. 15 [chapter 2.2]
  4. Soper BA, Shovlin JP. Evaluating a topography software program for fitting RGPs. Contact Lens Spectrum; October 1996.
  5. Szczotka LB. Clinical evaluation of a topographically based contact lens fitting software. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(1):14–19
  6. Koch DD, Wakil JS, Samuelson SW, Haft EA. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(4):342–347
  7. Wilson SE, Verity SM, Conger DL. Accuracy and precision of the corneal analysis system and the topographic modeling system. Cornea. 1992;11(1):28–35
  8. Jeandervin M, Barr J. Comparison of repeat videokeratography: repeatability and accuracy. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(9):663–669
  9. Klyce SD. Computer-assisted corneal topography. High-resolution graphic presentation and analysis of keratoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25(12):1426–1435
  10. Erdfelder E, Faul F. GPOWER: a-priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analysis for MS-DOS. Bonn, FRG: Department of Psychology, Bonn University; 1992.
  11. Szczotka LB, Reinhart W. Computerized videokeratoscopy contact lens software for RGP fitting in a bilateral postkeratoplasty patient: a clinical case report. Clao J. 1995;21(1):52–56
  12. Bufidis T, Konstas AG, Mamtziou E. The role of computerized corneal topography in rigid gas permeable contact lens fitting. Clao J. 1998;24(4):206–209
  13. Neumann S, Seiwert A. Die Verwendbarkeit des Oculus-Keratographen für die praktische Kontaktlinsenanpassung. Neues Optikerjournal. 1998;6:52–58
  14. Jaworski P, Wygledowska-Promienska D, Gierek-Ciaciura S. New possibilities of individual fitting of hard contact lenses with use of computer programs and videokeratography (CVK). Klin Oczna. 2004;106(4/5):633–636
  15. Stevenson RWW, O’Brart CM, Rosen E. Corneal topography in contact lens practice. Eur J Implant Ref Surg. 1995;7
  16. Szczotka LB. Corneal topography and contact lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16(3):433–453

PII: S1367-0484(07)00073-2

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.06.003

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 239-248 , September 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution