Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 223-232, September 2007

Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: Methods and findings to date

  • H. Wagner

      Affiliations

    • Nova Southeastern University, College of Optometry, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, United States
  • ,
  • J.T. Barr

      Affiliations

    • The Ohio State University College of Optometry, 338 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
  • ,
  • K. Zadnik

      Affiliations

    • The Ohio State University College of Optometry, 338 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 614 292 6603; fax: +1 614 292 4705.
  • ,
  • the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group

published online 10 May 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

To describe baseline and longitudinal findings of the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study.

Methods

The CLEK Study is an 8-year, multi-center, natural history study of 1209 patients with keratoconus who were examined annually for 8 years. Its goals are to prospectively characterize changes in vision, corneal curvature, corneal status, and vision-specific quality of life.

Results

CLEK Study subjects had a mean age at baseline of 39.3±10.9 years. At study entry, 65% of the patients wore rigid contact lenses, and 14% reported a family history of the disease. Subjects exhibited a 7-year decrease in high- (2.03 letters) and low- (4.06 letters) contrast, best-corrected visual acuity, with 19% demonstrating decreases of 10 or more letters in high-contrast, best-corrected acuity and 31% of subjects demonstrating decreases of 10 or more letters in low-contrast, best-corrected acuity in at least one eye. Subjects exhibited an average 8-year increase in corneal curvature of 1.60D in the flat corneal meridian, with 24% demonstrating increases of 3.00D or more. The 8-year incidence of corneal scarring was 20%, with younger age, corneal staining, steeper baseline corneal curvature, contact lens wear, and poorer low-contrast visual acuity predictive of corneal scarring. Data from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire suggest that the effect of keratoconus on vision-specific quality of life is disproportionate to its low prevalence and clinical severity.

Conclusion

Although we report measures of disease severity and visual function across the CLEK sample, clinicians can begin to envisage the course of keratoconus in individual patients by determining whether factors predictive of disease progression are present in those patients.

Keywords: Keratoconus, Visual acuity, Corneal scarring, Corneal curvature, Quality of life

 

PII: S1367-0484(07)00036-7

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2007.03.001

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 223-232, September 2007