« Previous
Next »
Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 2
, Pages 119-124
, May 2007
Is randomisation necessary for measuring defocus curves in pre-presbyopes?
References
- . Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery. Vision Res. 2004;44:1115–1125
- Comparison of visual acuities at different distances and defocus curves. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1964–1967
- . Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:646–648
- . Topology of the near response triad. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990;10:175–181
- . A mathematical model for estimating degree of accommodation by defocus curves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:B691
- . Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1435–1444
- . Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1878–1888
- . Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1722–1727
- . Evaluation of contrast acuity and defocus curve in bifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:513–523
- . Visual properties of the foldable Array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22(Suppl. 2):1313–1317
- . Bilateral implantation of asymmetrical diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:17–23
- . Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:663–665
- . Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239:683–687
- . Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:677–685
- . Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:318–324
- . Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:207–213
- . Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1289–1292
- . Comparison of the depths of focus with the naked eye and with three types of presbyopic contact lens correction. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1995;18:119–125
- . Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?. BMJ. 1999;318:1209
- . Repeatability of ETDRS visual acuity in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3294–3300
- . Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:342–348
- . New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53:740–745
- . Testing acuity of vision in general practice: reaching recommended standard. BMJ. 1994;309:1408
☆ This study was presented at the British Society for Refractive Surgery Annual Conference 2006 and at the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Annual Conference 2006.
PII: S1367-0484(07)00029-X
doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.02.005
© 2007 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 2
, Pages 119-124
, May 2007
