Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 125-133 , May 2007

Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses

  • Jon Walker

      Affiliations

    • Private practitioner, Jacksonville, FA, USA
    • ,
  • Graeme Young

      Affiliations

    • Private practitioner, Jacksonville, FA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1252 718719.
    • ,
  • Chris Hunt

      Affiliations

    • Private practitioner, Jacksonville, FA, USA
    • ,
  • Terri Henderson

      Affiliations

    • Vistakon Inc., Jacksonville, FA, USA

References 

  1. Nason RJ, Boshnick EL, Cannon WM, Dubow BW, Freeman MI, Kame RT, et al. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional wear in successful contact lens wearers. J Am Optom Assoc. 1994;65(11):774–780
  2. Hamano H, Watanabe K, Hamano T, et al. A study of the complications induced by conventional and disposable contact lenses. CLAO J. 1994;20:103–108
  3. Nilsson SEG, Soderqvist M. Clinical performance of a daily disposable contact lens: a 3-month prospective trial. J BCLA. 1995;18(3):81–86
  4. Solomon OD, Freeman MJ, Boshnick EL, et al. A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses. CLAO J. 1996;22:250–257
  5. Suchecki JK, Ehlers WH, Donshik PC. A comparison of contact lens-related complications in various daily wear modalities. CLAO J. 2000;26:204–213
  6. Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA, Naduvilath T, Velala I, Gora R, et al. Comparison of adverse events with daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2327–2334
  7. Morgan PB, Efron NE, Woods CA, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2005. CL Spectr. 2006;21(1):35–39
  8. Doughty MJ, Fonn D, Richter D, et al. A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:624–631
  9. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Response of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:40–46
  10. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Du Toit R, Portello J, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea. 2001;20:610–618
  11. Vajdic C, Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Cornish RM. The frequency of ocular symptoms during spectacle and daily soft and rigid lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:705–711
  12. Guillon M, Maissa C. Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and non-wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:829–834
  13. Nichols JJ, Zeigler C, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK. Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1911–1914
  14. Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:25–30
  15. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. ICLC. 1999;26:157–162
  16. Young G, Veys J, Coleman S. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Optom Physiol Opt. 2002;22:516–527
  17. Inaba M. 1-Day Acuvue vs. Focus Dailies: a comparison of comfort, user preference, and incidence of corneal complications. CLAO J. 2000;26:141–145
  18. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Chalmers R, Begley C. The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea. 2002;21:469–475
  19. Guillon M, McGrogan L, Guillon JP, Styles E, Maissa C. Effect of material ionicity on the performance of daily disposable contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 1997;20:3–8
  20. Coles ML, Brennan NA, Shuley V, et al. The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2004;87:367–371
  21. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, et al. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multi-purpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31:166–175

PII: S1367-0484(07)00028-8

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.02.004

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 125-133 , May 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution