Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 125-133, May 2007

Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses

  • Jon Walker

      Affiliations

    • Private practitioner, Jacksonville, FA, USA
  • ,
  • Graeme Young

      Affiliations

    • Private practitioner, Jacksonville, FA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1252 718719.
  • ,
  • Chris Hunt

      Affiliations

    • Private practitioner, Jacksonville, FA, USA
  • ,
  • Terri Henderson

      Affiliations

    • Vistakon Inc., Jacksonville, FA, USA

published online 02 April 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical performance of two daily disposable contact lenses: 1-DAY ACUVUE® (1DA) (etafilcon A, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care) and FOCUS® DAILIES® with AquaComfort™ (FD) (nelfilcon A, CIBA Vision, Inc.), which contains a quickly released moisture enhancing agent, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).

Methods

This was a 1-week, daily wear, subject-masked, bilateral, parallel group study with subjects randomly assigned to one of two daily disposable soft contact lenses. Subjects were existing soft contact lens wearers in the age range 18–39 years with a spherical refraction between −0.50 and −6.00D. Subjects were assessed at baseline and after 1 week. Assessments included both subjective (symptoms, wearing time, vision) and objective (lens fit and ocular health) outcomes.

Results

Twenty clinical sites enrolled 282 subjects (74% female) of whom 276 (98%) successfully completed the study. Significantly more 1DA wearers reported higher mean comfort scores than with FD (3.95 versus 3.41, respectively, P<0.0001). End-of-day comfort means were also significantly higher with the 1DA group compared to the FD group (3.3 versus 3.0, P=0.03). The 1DA group reported significantly longer mean overall wearing time (1DA was worn on average 0.66±0.30h longer than FD, P=0.03) and longer mean comfortable wearing time (1DA was worn on average 1.73±0.35h longer than FD, P<0.0001). The 1DA lens generally showed significantly better on-eye fitting in terms of movement in primary (P<0.0001) and upgaze (P<0.0001) and ease of removal from the eye (92% versus 63%, P<0.0001) compared to FD. There was significantly less corneal staining observed with the 1DA wearing eyes compared with the FD wearing eyes (23% versus 45%, respectively, P<0.0001). Finally, there was a weak correlation between corneal staining and comfort for FD (r=0.27, P=0.002, n=136), but not for 1DA (r=−0.11, P=0.18, n=140).

Conclusion

Subjective and objective clinical performance differences between two commonly used daily disposable lenses highlight that, although both lenses may be considered as clinically acceptable, these lenses should not be regarded as interchangeable.

Keywords: Contact lenses, Daily disposable, Wearing time, Corneal staining

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(07)00028-8

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2007.02.004

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 125-133, May 2007