Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales☆
Abstract
Purpose
The primary objective was to compare measures of bulbar redness objectively using a photometric method with standard grading methods. Measures of redness were made on 24 participants wearing a silicone hydrogel contact lens in one eye for overnight wear. This report compares hyperaemia after 1 week of daily wear (baseline) with redness measured after 6 months of overnight wear.
Method
A new method of objectively measuring bulbar conjunctival redness was performed using the Spectrascan650® Photometer by Photo Research® under fixed illumination. Photometric measures in CIEu* chromaticity values involve the measurement of chromaticity, a physical analogue of redness, greenness and blueness in the image. This method was validated in Part 1 of the study using repeated measurements on the photographic CCLRU scale. In Part 2 of the study, the photographic grading scale (CCLRU) from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) was used to make the comparison.
Results
Part 1 indicated that the photometer provides a repeatable and reliable measure of bulbar redness (CCC
=
0.989). A moderately strong and significant correlation was found between the CIEu* chromaticity values and the analogue data (R
=
0.795, p
=
0.000) at each measurement session (from baseline to 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3 and 6 months of overnight wear).
Conclusions
This new standardized and objective method of measuring bulbar redness has great potential to replace subjective grading scales, especially with multi-centre studies, where variability between investigators occurs. This method may also detect smaller changes between visits or between eyes.
Keywords: Bulbar hyperemia, Grading scales, Ocular redness, Photometry, Chromaticity, Silicone hydrogel
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ This manuscript has not previously been published and is not currently under review with any other journal.
PII: S1367-0484(06)00161-5
doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.12.003
Crown Copyright © 2007. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
