Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 257-262, December 2006

The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes

  • Sunil Shah

      Affiliations

    • Heart of England Foundation Trust, Solihull, UK
    • Ophthalmic Research Group Neurosciences Research Institute, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
    • Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Heart of England Foundation Trust, Lode Lane, Solihull, West Midlands B91 2JL, UK. Tel.: +44 121 424 4074; fax: +44 121 424 5462.
  • ,
  • Mohammed Laiquzzaman

      Affiliations

    • Heart of England Foundation Trust, Solihull, UK
  • ,
  • Ian Cunliffe

      Affiliations

    • Heart of England Foundation Trust, Solihull, UK
    • Ophthalmic Research Group Neurosciences Research Institute, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
    • Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • Sanjay Mantry

      Affiliations

    • Heart of England Foundation Trust, Solihull, UK
    • Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, UK

published online 08 November 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

The aim of this study was to measure ocular hysteresis and corneal resistance factor (CRF), novel methods of analysing ocular rigidity/elasticity and to determine the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT), hysteresis and CRF in normal subjects.

Design

Prospective, cross-sectional, clinical trial.

Participants

The study included 207 normal eyes.

Methods

Hysteresis and CRF were measured by the ocular response analyser. The CCT was measured using a hand held ultrasonic pachymeter.

Main outcome measures

Ocular hysteresis and CRF in normal patients and their relationship with CCT.

Results

The mean hysteresis was 10.7±2.0mmHg standard deviation (S.D.) (range 6.1–17.6mmHg); the mean CRF was 10.3±2.0 (range 5.7–17.1mmHg). The mean CCT was 545.0±36.4μm (471–650μm). The relationship between hysteresis and CCT; CRF and CCT; CRF and hysteresis were significant (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that corneal hysteresis increased with increasing CCT, however, the correlation was moderate. It would appear that CCT, hysteresis and CRF may measure different biomechanical aspects of ocular rigidity and are likely to be useful additional measurement to CCT in the assessment of ocular rigidity when measuring intraocular pressure (IOP). This may be of particular importance when trying to correct IOP measurements for increased or decreased ocular rigidity.

Keywords: Hysteresis, Central corneal thickness, Elasticity, Rigidity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(06)00131-7

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.09.006

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 257-262, December 2006