Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 81-83, May 2006

The AS biometry technique—A novel technique to aid accurate intraocular lens power calculation after corneal laser refractive surgery

  • Chitra Sambare

      Affiliations

    • The Ophthalmic Department, Kempston Road, Bedford Hospital, Bedford MK42 9DJ, UK
  • ,
  • Shehzad Naroo

      Affiliations

    • Ophthalmic Research Group, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
  • ,
  • Sunil Shah

      Affiliations

    • Midland Eye Institute, 50 Lode Lane, Solihull, West Midlands B91 2AW, UK
  • ,
  • Anant Sharma

      Affiliations

    • The Ophthalmic Department, Kempston Road, Bedford Hospital, Bedford MK42 9DJ, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1234 313 864; fax: +44 1234 313 864.

published online 07 April 2006.

Abstract 

Intraocular lens power (IOL) calculation for cataract surgery has been shown to be inaccurate after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Many techniques exist to calculate corneal power with varying results and require the clinician to be aware of the pitfalls of IOL power calculation in post-refractive eyes.

The AS biometry method proposed here is a simple method which does not rely on the calculation of corneal power. This new method is compared to the current gold standard the clinical history method (CHM).

Twenty-nine eyes of 15 patients had routine biometry prior to LASIK, LASEK or PRK.

The range of pre-operative spherical equivalent refractive error was −5.37 to +4.00diopters.

The post-operative refraction was measured at 3–6 months. The IOL power calculation was calculated using the AS biometry method and the CHM. The two methods were compared using the Student's paired t-test and the Bland Altman technique.

There was no statistical difference between the AS biometry method and the CHM. The paired Student's t-test comparing the AS biometry method and the CHM showed no statistical difference, t=0.33 with a p-value of 0.75, at a 95% confidence interval.

The authors conclude that the AS biometry technique is as accurate as the CHM. The former is a simpler method which avoids many of the pitfalls and confounding factors involved in IOL power calculation following corneal excimer laser surgery. However, like the CHM it requires measurements prior to laser surgery.

Keywords: LASIK, LASEK, PRK, Biometry, Intraocular lens power calculation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was presented at the British Society for Refractive Surgery Annual Conference in Birmingham, UK, in 2004.

PII: S1367-0484(06)00030-0

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.02.005

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 81-83, May 2006