Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 31-40, March 2006

A clinical evaluation of Systane

  • Paul Gifford

      Affiliations

    • Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Optometry, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 9385 4536; fax: +61 2 9313 6243.
  • ,
  • Bruce J.W. Evans

      Affiliations

    • Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
    • Institute of Optometry, 56-62 Newington Causeway, London SE1 6DS, UK
  • ,
  • Judith Morris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
    • Institute of Optometry, 56-62 Newington Causeway, London SE1 6DS, UK

published online 14 February 2006.

Abstract 

Background

Systane is a new artificial tear solution containing the pH dependent gelling polymer hydroxypropyl-Guar (HP-Guar). We evaluated Systane in an open trial.

Methods

Patients complaining of dry feeling eyes were eligible to enrol, with inclusion criteria based on the presence of corneal staining with sodium fluorescein (NaFl) and participants’ desire to use ocular lubricants. Six symptoms of ocular irritation were rated on a four-point scale. Conjunctival injection, conjunctival and corneal fluorescein staining were graded and tear break-up time (TBUT) and tear meniscus height were measured. Subjects were instructed to instil one drop of Systane into each eye four times a day for approximately four weeks. Ocular symptoms and signs were then reassessed and subjects were asked to rate eight statements concerning their satisfaction with the product.

Results

A total of 38 subjects were enrolled with 32 completing the follow-up visit. The following variables improved significantly at follow-up: all ocular irritation symptom scores, conjunctival injection, total conjunctival and total corneal staining scores, and TBUT. Tear meniscus height showed no significant change. Systane proved effective in reducing the symptoms of dry eye; however induced blur appeared to be a complication for many participants.

Conclusions

The study represents a community based evaluation of the benefits of a novel ocular lubricant in optometric practice. The results suggest that the gelling properties of HP-Guar may be influential in promoting ocular surface recovery through improved ocular surface retention, however further randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm this. The extent and significance of induced blur also needs further investigation.

Keywords: Systane, HP-Guar, Dry eye, Clinical trial, Ocular lubricant

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(06)00004-X

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2005.12.003

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 31-40, March 2006