Erratum to “Abstracts of the 29th BCLA Annual Clinical Conference, Brighton, 2005” [Contact Lens Anterior Eye 28 (3) 137–142]☆
Article Outline
The publisher regrets that when the above Abstracts were printed, one abstract was omitted. The missing abstract is printed below.
James S. Wolffsohn*, Rachael C. Peterson
Neurosciences Research Institute, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
E-mail address: j.s.w.wolffsohn@aston.ac.uk
Purpose: To examine the spectral radiance output of slit-lamp cobalt blue illumination and the spectral transmission of yellow barrier enhancement filters to assess the optimisation of fluorescein image viewing and capture.
Method: The spectral radiance of seven different models of slit-lamp cobalt luminance was measured with a Spectrascan PR-650 photometer and the illumination outputs from three slit-lamps of the same model were measured. The spectral transmission of three barrier filters (two of which were integrated into the slit-lamp optics) were measured with a Cary 2300 Spectrophotometer.
Results: The spectral radiance of the cobalt blue illumination was typically between 404 and 504
nm, with a peak at between 452 and 484
nm. All the slit-lamps examined showed a similar light distribution (S.D. of difference 0.20–1.13%). Comparison between three slit-lamps of the same model showed a wide range of maximum light intensity (438–634
cd/m2), but a similar spectral radiance distribution. The barrier filters had a cut-off at 510–520
nm, achieving 90.0–98.5% transmission above 580
nm. However, the external cardboard mounted filter excluded less light below 500
nm (7.4%) compared to the two integrated filters (<0.1%).
Conclusion: For optimal fluorescence, the light source should have maximum power at the wavelengths absorbed by the fluorophore (∼485
nm) and little power at the wavelengths emitted by the fluorophore (∼510–520
nm). Of the slit-lamps examined, only between 8.9 and 29.3% of the illumination output was optimised for >80% fluorescein excitation and 1.9–10.6% of the illumination overlapped with that emitted by the fluorophore. A barrier filter enhances observation by obscuring the non-fluorescing reflected light. As the fluorescein excitation and emission spectra at the average pH of the eye overlap at 500
nm, yellow barrier enhancement filters should ideally have a lower cut-off.
☆ Abstracts of selected papers and posters presented at the British Contact Lens Association's Clinical Conference, Brighton, UK, 3–5 June 2005.
PII: S1367-0484(05)00087-1
doi:10.1016/j.clae.2005.11.001
© 2005 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Refers to article:
- Abstracts of the 29th BCLA Annual Clinical Conference
