Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 113-119, September 2005

In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: Effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus

  • Shangtong Zhang

      Affiliations

    • Biology Department, Georgia State University, Kell Hall, 24 Peachtree Center Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 404 651 3110; fax: +1 404 651 2509.
  • ,
  • Roya N. Borazjani

      Affiliations

    • Research Group, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Joseph C. Salamone

      Affiliations

    • Research Group, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Donald G. Ahearn

      Affiliations

    • Biology Department, Georgia State University, Kell Hall, 24 Peachtree Center Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
  • ,
  • Sidney A. Crow Jr.

      Affiliations

    • Biology Department, Georgia State University, Kell Hall, 24 Peachtree Center Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
  • ,
  • George E. Pierce

      Affiliations

    • Biology Department, Georgia State University, Kell Hall, 24 Peachtree Center Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA

published online 01 August 2005.

Abstract 

Purpose:

To compare lysozyme adsorption and absorption and bacterial adhesion interactions on conventional (etafilcon A) and silicone (balafilcon A) hydrogel contact lenses.

Method:

Lysozyme concentrations and activities associated with the lenses were determined after solvent extraction (trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile) and directly on the lenses without extraction with micrococcal- and micro-bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assays. Cells of bacteria with radiolabeled leucine and a cell recovery procedure were used in determinations of bacterial adhesion to lenses.

Results:

Lysozyme was adsorbed and absorbed to the conventional etafilcon A lens at about a 10-fold greater concentration than to the balafilcon A silicone hydrogel lens. Enzyme activities on the surfaces of both lenses were similar but replenished after saline extraction only with the etafilcon A lens. Lysozyme on the lens surface showed significant lysis of Micrococcus luteus but had a negligible effect on the adhesion and survival of Staphylococcus aureus. Lysozyme did not appear to affect the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on lenses.

Conclusion:

In vitro experiments show that concentrations of active lysozyme on the surface of the etafilcon A lens, unlike the balafilcon A lens which showed negligible absorption, may be sustained from the lens matrix. Lysozyme deposited on hydrogel lenses had marked activity against M. luteus but relatively minor effects on the primary adhesion of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus.

Keywords: Lysozyme, Hydrogel contact lenses, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1367-0484(05)00047-0

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2005.06.003

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 113-119, September 2005