Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 21-28 , March 2005

Effect of multipurpose solutions for contact lens care on the in vitro drug-induced spoliation of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) in simulated aqueous humour

  • Traian V. Chirila

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials and Polymer Research, Lions Eye Institute, and Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, 2 Verdun Street, Nedlands 6009, WA, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 8 9381 0856; fax: +61 8 9382 1171.
    • ,
  • David A. Morrison

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials and Polymer Research, Lions Eye Institute, and Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, 2 Verdun Street, Nedlands 6009, WA, Australia
    • ,
  • Zoya Gridneva

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials and Polymer Research, Lions Eye Institute, and Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, 2 Verdun Street, Nedlands 6009, WA, Australia
    • ,
  • Danielle Meyrick

      Affiliations

    • Division of Science and Engineering, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch 6150, WA, Australia
    • ,
  • Celia R. Hicks

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials and Polymer Research, Lions Eye Institute, and Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, 2 Verdun Street, Nedlands 6009, WA, Australia
    • ,
  • John M. Webb

      Affiliations

    • Division of Science and Engineering, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch 6150, WA, Australia

References 

  1. Ruben M, Tripathi RC, Winder AF. Calcium deposition as a cause of spoilation of hydrophilic soft contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975;59:141–148
  2. Hilbert J, Lowther G, King J. Deposition of substances within hydrophilic lenses. J Optom Physiol Optics. 1976;53:51–54
  3. Lowther GE. The relationship between the chemistry of the tear film and hydrophilic lens deposits. In: Soft contact lenses. Proceedings of the Second National Research Symposium, Chicago, 1975. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1977. p. 42–50.
  4. Dreyer V, Jensen OA, Prause JU. Morphological, histochemical and X-ray microanalytical examination of deposits on soft contact lenses in extended wearing. Acta Ophthalmol. 1979;57:847–859
  5. Gachon AM, Bilbaut T, Dastugue B. Adsorption of tear proteins on soft contact lenses. Exp Eye Res. 1985;40:105–116
  6. Bilbaut T, Gachon AM, Dastugue B. Deposits on soft contact lenses. Electrophoresis and scanning electron microscopic examinations. Exp Eye Res. 1986;43:153–165
  7. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:842–849
  8. Bowers RWJ, Tighe BJ. Studies of the ocular compatibility of hydrogels. A review of the clinical manifestations of spoilation. Biomaterials. 1987;8:83–88
  9. Bowers RWJ, Tighe BJ. Studies of the ocular compatibility of hydrogels. White spot deposits—incidence of occurrence, location and gross morphology. Biomaterials. 1987;8:89–93
  10. Bowers RWJ, Tighe BJ. Studies of the ocular compatibility of hydrogels. White spot deposits—chemical composition and geological arrangement of components. Biomaterials. 1987;8:172–176
  11. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:362–373
  12. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J. 1989;15:185–188
  13. Myers RI, Larsen DW, Tsao M, Castellano C, Becherer LD, Fontana F, et al. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:776–782
  14. Abbott JM, Bowers RWJ, Franklin VJ, Tighe BJ. Studies in the ocular compatibility of hydrogels (IV): observations on the role of calcium in deposit formation. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1991;14:21–28
  15. Tighe B, Franklin V. Lens deposition and spoilation. In:  Larke JR editors. The eye in contact lens wear. 2nd ed.. Boston: Butterworth–Heinemann; 1997;p. 49–100
  16. Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. I. Lens uptake of 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;36:119–124
  17. Stapleton F, Phillips AJ, Hopkins GA. Drugs and solutions in contact lens practice and related microbiology. In:  Phillips AJ,  Speedwell L,  Stone J editor. Contact Lenses. 4th ed.. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann; 1997;p. 93–153
  18. Bucher PJM, Büchi ER, Daicker BC. Dystrophic calcification of an implanted hydroxyethylmethacrylate intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1431–1435
  19. Werner L, Apple DJ, Kaskaloglu M, Pandey SK. Dense opacification of the optical component of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens. A clinicopathological analysis of 9 explanted lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1485–1492
  20. Tehrani M, Mamalis N, Wallin T, Dick HB, Stoffelns BM, Olson R, et al. Late postoperative opacification of MemoryLens hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:115–122
  21. Werner L, Apple DJ, Escobar-Gomez M, Öhrström A, Crayford BB, Bianchi R, et al. Post-operative deposition of calcium on the surfaces of a hydrogel intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2179–2185
  22. Fernando GT, Crayford BB. Visually significant calcification of hydrogel intraocular lenses necessitating explantation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;28:280–286
  23. Yu AKF, Shek TWH. Hydroxyapatite formation on implanted hydrogel lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:611–614
  24. Yu AKF, Kwan KYW, Chan DHY. Clinical features of 46 eyes with calcified hydrogel intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1596–1606
  25. Yu AKF, Ng ASY. Complications and clinical outcomes of intraocular lens exchange in patients with calcified hydrogel lenses. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1217–1222
  26. Habib NE, Freegard TJ, Gock G, Newman PL, Moate RM. Late surface opacification of Hydroview® intraocular lenses. Eye. 2002;16:69–74
  27. Pandey SK, Werner L, Apple DJ, Gravel JP. Calcium precipitation on the optical surfaces of a foldable intraocular lens: a clinicopathological correlation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:391–393
  28. Dorey MW, Brownstein S, Hill VE, Mathew B, Botton G, Kertes PJ, et al. Proposed pathogenesis for the delayed post-operative opacification of the hydroview hydrogel intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:591–598
  29. Izak AM, Werner L, Pandey SK, Apple DJ. Calcification of modern foldable hydrogel intraocular lens designs. Eye. 2003;17:393–406
  30. Chirila TV, Vijayasekaran S, Horne R, Chen YC, Dalton PD, Constable IJ, et al. Interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) as a permanent joint between the elements of a new type of artificial cornea. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28:745–753
  31. Hicks CR, Chirila TV, Clayton AB, Fitton JH, Vijayasekaran S, Lou X, et al. Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:18–25
  32. Chirila TV. An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3311–3317
  33. Crawford GJ, Hicks CR, Lou X, Vijayasekaran S, Tan D, Mulholland B, et al. The Chirila keratoprosthesis: phase I human clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:883–889
  34. Hicks CR, Crawford GJ, Lou X, Tan DT, Snibson GR, Sutton G, et al. Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor™: device, preliminary outcomes and complications. Eye. 2003;17:385–392
  35. Hicks CR, Crawford GJ, Tan DT, Snibson GR, Sutton GL, Downie N, et al. AlphaCor™ cases: comparative outcomes. Cornea. 2003;22:583–590
  36. Hicks CR, Chirila TV, Werner L, Crawford GJ, Apple DJ, Constable IJ. Deposits in artificial corneas: risk factors and prevention. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32:185–191
  37. Chirila TV, Gridneva Z, Morrison DA, Barry CJ, Hicks CR, Hill DJT, et al. Spontaneous calcification of acrylic hydrogels in abiotic calcifying media and the relevance of ionic solute effects. J Mater Sci. 2004;39:1861–1864
  38. Chirila TV, Morrison DA, Hicks CR, Gridneva Z, Barry CJ, Vijayasekaran S. In vitro drug-induced spoliation of a keratoprosthetic hydrogel. Cornea. 2004;23:620–629
  39. Franklin V, Tighe B, Tonge S. Disclosure—the true story of multi-purpose solutions. Optician. 1995;209(5500):25–28
  40. Christie C. Solutions: same or different?. 1999;218(5717):20–24
  41. Janiak C. Damit der Durchblick erhalten bleibt: Proteinentfernung von Kontaktlinsen. Chem uns Zeit. 2001;35:348–354
  42. House HO, Leach NE, Edrington TB, Gunning JN, Parsick SJ, Cyert L, et al. Contact lens daily cleaner efficacy: multipurpose versus single-purpose products. ICLC. 1991;18:238–243
  43. Jung J, Rapp J. The efficacy of hydrophilic contact lens cleaning systems in removing protein deposits. CLAO J. 1993;19:47–49
  44. Simmons PA, Ridder WH, Edrington TB, Ho S, Lau KC. Passive protein removal by two multipurpose lens solutions: comparison of effects on in vitro deposited and patient-worn hydrogel contact lenses. ICLC. 1999;26:33–38
  45. Bergmanson JPG, Ross RN. A masked quantitative cytologic study of the safety of a multipurpose contact lens solution applied to the in vivo rabbit eye. J Am Optom Assoc. 1993;64:308–314
  46. Begley CG, Waggoner PJ, Jani NB, Meetz RE. The effects of soft contact lens disinfection solutions on rabbit corneal epithelium. CLAO J. 1994;20:52–58
  47. Pham XT, Huff JW. Cytotoxicity evaluation of multipurpose contact lens solutions using an in vitro test battery. CLAO J. 1999;25:28–35
  48. Tchao R, McCanna DJ, Miller MJ. Comparison of contact lens multipurpose solutions by in vitro sodium fluorescein permeability assay. CLAO J. 2002;28:151–156
  49. Sumide T, Tsuchiya T. Effects of multipurpose solutions (MPS) for hydrogel contact lenses on gap-junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) in rabbit corneal keratocytes. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater. 2003;64 B:57–64
  50. Yeaton K. The comfort factor: assessing patient satisfaction with Opti-Free® vs. other contact cleaning products. Adv Therapy. 1994;11:297–302
  51. Simmons PA, Donshik PC, Kelly WF, Vehige JG. Conditioning of hydrogel lenses by a multipurpose solution containing an ocular lubricant. CLAO J. 2001;27:192–194
  52. Guillon M, Maissa C. Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing. CLAO J. 2002;28:186–191
  53. Begley CG, Paragina S, Sporn A. An analysis of contact lens enzyme cleaners. J Am Optom Assoc. 1990;61:190–194
  54. Bito LZ. Intraocular fluid dynamics. I. Steady-state concentration gradients of magnesium, potassium and calcium in relation to the sites and mechanisms of ocular cation transport process. Exp Eye Res. 1970;10:102–116
  55. Gaasterland DE, Pederson JE, MacLellan HM, Reddy VN. Rhesus monkey aqueous humor composition and a primate ocular perfusate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979;18:1139–1150
  56. van Haeringen NJ. Clinical biochemistry of tears. Surv Ophthalmol. 1982;26:84–96
  57. Caprioli J. The ciliary epithelia and aqueous humor. In:  Hart WM editors. Adler's physiology of the eye. 9th ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 1992;p. 228–47
  58. Hicks CR, Crawford GJ. Melting after keratoprosthesis implantation: the effects of medroxyprogesterone. Cornea. 2003;22:497–500
  59. Bergmanson JPG, Barbeito R. Clinical assessment of ocular response to a multipurpose contact lens care solution. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1995;15:535–544
  60. Hu Z, Ellis EJ, Denick Jr J, Method and composition for rewetting and preventing deposits on contact lens. U.S. Pat. 6,037,328; March 14, 2000.

PII: S1367-0484(04)00072-4

doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2004.09.004

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 21-28 , March 2005

Article Tools